Firearms experts who say; ?I can't do it so it can't be done?, cannot be trusted

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Firearms experts who say; ?I can't do it so it can't be done?, cannot be trusted  (Read 93643 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
A metaphor.

Still wrong because the New York Times authorized version of The Warren Commission Report is not abbreviated. Words per page is greater but that's the only discernible difference.

I think you misunderstood his point. The WCR is a bunch of summaries and conclusions that are not actually supported by the evidence and testimonies in the Hearings and Exhibits.
« Last Edit: March 19, 2019, 12:20:50 PM by John Iacoletti »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
creates new laws of physics and etc. is it similar to reading the failing NYTimes newspaper

"the failing NYTimes newspaper"

LOL... now where have I heard that one before... oh yeah.. from the guy who has 'all the words... the best words..'



The Groper/Kidnapper-in-Chief himself:



Bray, Donald, BRAY
« Last Edit: March 19, 2019, 06:52:02 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Paperboy Chaps is your name.  Year to date, I have found a whopping whole 2 real stories out of thousands that were published by your employer, the NYTimes. Even the Washington Post has more real stories than the NYTimes this year, although, they only lead the Times by one real story for a total of 3. You should see if WaPo will hire you for your delivery skills, they can afford to pay more. Carlos Slim pays less than Goofy Bezos

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Chapman and Lidell are scattering straw all over the place again [another metaphor]  ...drifting further away from the original topic to proselytize unrelated ambiguous ideas. I challenge them to fire the model Carcano rifle and hit the broadside of a barn at 50 feet in 6 seconds. 

Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
Chapman and Lidell are scattering straw all over the place again [another metaphor]  ...drifting further away from the original topic to proselytize unrelated ambiguous ideas. I challenge them to fire the model Carcano rifle and hit the broadside of a barn at 50 feet in 6 seconds.

And make sure not to practice and use a wonky scope. I wager 40 quatloos that they fail.

Offline Joe Elliott

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1845
"Roger Craig" and then "Craig Rogers"? Or should it be Craig Roberts? Put the crack pipe down, Joe. It's affecting your mind.
His name is not important to me. Nor should it be important to anyone else. A lair is still a liar.

Questions:

What evidence, beyond the ?word? of Craig Roberts, that Carlos Hathcock ever set up a test to see if the shooting by Oswald on November 22 was feasible?

What evidence, beyond the ?word? of Craig Roberts, that Carlos Hathcock ever claimed he set up a test to see if the shooting by Oswald on November 22 was feasible?

I expect you to dodge these two simple questions.

Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
His name is not important to me. Nor should it be important to anyone else. A lair is still a liar.

Questions:

What evidence, beyond the ?word? of Craig Roberts, that Carlos Hathcock ever set up a test to see if the shooting by Oswald on November 22 was feasible?

What evidence, beyond the ?word? of Craig Roberts, that Carlos Hathcock ever claimed he set up a test to see if the shooting by Oswald on November 22 was feasible?

I expect you to dodge these two simple questions.
Nonsense. The burden is on you to prove Oswald committed the crime.  No one has to do prove anything to you. Don't kid yourself.
Here's a nice game for you to ponder: http://krusch.com/jfkshell/story.html
Use your head