Firearms experts who say; ?I can't do it so it can't be done?, cannot be trusted

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Firearms experts who say; ?I can't do it so it can't be done?, cannot be trusted  (Read 93630 times)

Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Assertion, assertion, assertion ad infinitum. No proof... just silly speculation.

No trial for Lee Harvey Oswald (had he not been killed by Jack Ruby) you say?
An impossible occurrence that would only be postulated by a fool.

Lee Harvey Oswald would have been, tried, convicted and sentenced for the murders of John F. Kennedy and JD Tippit. After the routine appeal he would have been executed. To put it plainly, the history books would record that Lee Harvey Oswald: Died in the electric-chair in Huntsville Texas.
No proof is no proof. And as far as I know, there was not a trial.
You, on the other hand, say....."but-but-but if-if if-if there were" 
Ross, you are a sick defender of lies.

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Assertion, assertion, assertion ad infinitum. No proof... just silly speculation.

No trial for Lee Harvey Oswald (had he not been killed by Jack Ruby) you say?
An impossible occurrence that would only be postulated by a fool.

Lee Harvey Oswald would have been, tried, convicted and sentenced for the murders of John F. Kennedy and JD Tippit. After the routine appeal he would have been executed. To put it plainly, the history books would record that Lee Harvey Oswald: Died in the electric-chair in Huntsville Texas.

Lee Harvey Oswald would have been, tried, convicted and sentenced for the murders of John F. Kennedy and JD Tippit.

Any body with a functioning brain would conclude that Lee Oswald would never have been tried.....   There simply wasn't any solid evidence that he had committed the crime.    That much should be clear to anybody who is a participant in these debates.   

Based on the THEORY that Lee Oswald had fired a rifle from that SE corner window. .....( which is the key starting point) ....No 5"9" man could have sat on a box and and used the stack of Rolling Readers as a rifle rest and declined the muzzle of the rifle down toward Elm street.    Based on that same THEORY.....The rifle would have to have been a Kentucky loooooong rifle  for the muzzle to have protruded out of that window.....The carcano is a mere 40 inches long... so  a man sitting on a box four feet back from the wall and using the stack of Rolling Readers as a rifle rest could not have had the muzzle out of the window.

And this is merely the start.....  Nearly every piece of evidence can be shown to be false.

Offline Ross Lidell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 451
No proof is no proof. And as far as I know, there was not a trial.
You, on the other hand, say....."but-but-but if-if if-if there were" 
Ross, you are a sick defender of lies.

That contains an ad hominem attack Pete. Impeaches your credibility.


Offline Ross Lidell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 451
Lee Harvey Oswald would have been, tried, convicted and sentenced for the murders of John F. Kennedy and JD Tippit.

Any body with a functioning brain would conclude that Lee Oswald would never have been tried.....   There simply wasn't any solid evidence that he had committed the crime.    That much should be clear to anybody who is a participant in these debates.   

Based on the THEORY that Lee Oswald had fired a rifle from that SE corner window. .....( which is the key starting point) ....No 5"9" man could have sat on a box and and used the stack of Rolling Readers as a rifle rest and declined the muzzle of the rifle down toward Elm street.    Based on that same THEORY.....The rifle would have to have been a Kentucky loooooong rifle  for the muzzle to have protruded out of that window.....The carcano is a mere 40 inches long... so  a man sitting on a box four feet back from the wall and using the stack of Rolling Readers as a rifle rest could not have had the muzzle out of the window.

And this is merely the start.....  Nearly every piece of evidence can be shown to be false.

The carcano is a mere 40 inches long... so  a man sitting on a box four feet back from the wall and using the stack of Rolling Readers as a rifle rest could not have had the muzzle out of the window.

Witnesses report a man with a rifle much closer to the window than 4 feet away.

Do you have evidence that the 6th floor shooter was 4 feet back from the window?

Nearly every piece of evidence can be shown to be false.

Aha... "nearly every piece of evidence can be shown to be false". Now we're getting somewhere!!!

That means that you believe some pieces of evidence are not false. List them in your reply.


Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
The carcano is a mere 40 inches long... so  a man sitting on a box four feet back from the wall and using the stack of Rolling Readers as a rifle rest could not have had the muzzle out of the window.

Witnesses report a man with a rifle much closer to the window than 4 feet away.

Do you have evidence that the 6th floor shooter was 4 feet back from the window?

Nearly every piece of evidence can be shown to be false.

Aha... "nearly every piece of evidence can be shown to be false". Now we're getting somewhere!!!

That means that you believe some pieces of evidence are not false. List them in your reply.

Do you have evidence that the 6th floor shooter was 4 feet back from the window?

See the "Crime scene photos"....

That means that you believe some pieces of evidence are not false. List them in your reply.

Detective Studebaker created a map of the sixth floor and he measured exact distances  of various places on the sixth floor....He indicated that the rifle was found in the NW corner near the top of the stairs. He measured the distance from the north wall to the rifle at 15' 4"   The cover up committee place the rifle at 10 feet from the north wall.   They shorten the distance by 5 feet to make their imaginary THEORY that Lee Oswald has dashed by the place and hastily dumped the rifle behind the boxes that formed the south wall of the aisle leading to the stairs. 

Studebaker's map is authentic....

Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
That contains an ad hominem attack Pete. Impeaches your credibility.
Oh, you poor thing.
Here's another question for Prof. Ross and one he will avoid.
The planted Carcano had a scope adjusted for a left-handed shooter, but Oswald was right-handed???
It was so misaligned they needed to put 2 metal shims under it before a military lab could test fire it.
Explain away Prof Ross

Offline Ross Lidell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 451
Oh, you poor thing.
Here's another question for Prof. Ross and one he will avoid.
The planted Carcano had a scope adjusted for a left-handed shooter, but Oswald was right-handed???
It was so misaligned they needed to put 2 metal shims under it before a military lab could test fire it.
Explain away Prof Ross

The planted Carcano had a scope adjusted for a left-handed shooter, but Oswald was right-handed???

The scope was offset to the left because of the bolt-action which was on top of the rifle. A scope mounted on the right of the rifle would interfere with the movement of the bolt when ejecting a spent cartridge and loading a new one.

There's no proof that the Carcano was planted.

Questions for you who believes a Carcano was planted on the 6th floor of the TSBD:

-- Who planted the Carcano in the TSBD?

-- When was the Carcano planted in the TSBD?

The shims were lost when Lt. Carl Day of the Crime Lab disassembled the Carcano looking for "prints"?