Oswald's Rifle Capability

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Oswald's Rifle Capability  (Read 67958 times)

Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: Oswald's Rifle Capability
« Reply #70 on: March 17, 2019, 10:13:45 AM »
All of this speculation about Oswald's rifle capability is a red herring.  All of the evidence found indicated that it was Oswald alone who shot and killed JFK. Regardless of how he scored in the firing test while in the USMC, how many times Oswald worked the bolt to  familiarize himself with the weapon, how many times he managed to practice with the rifle while in New Orleans, whether you believe Marina, the accuracy of the MC with and without using the scope (nobody knows if Oswald actually used the scope), the actual timeline of the sequence of shots if the first shot missed could be as long as over 8 seconds, the evidence strongly supports the fact that it was Oswald who was the SN shooter. NO OTHER SUSPECT HAS BEEN FOUND WHO COULD HAVE BEEN THE SHOOTER! Oswald pulled the trigger three times, missed the first shot, scored a hit on JFK that went through his neck, out his throat, entered JBC as the 6.5 mm WC copper jacketed bullet was beginning to yaw at approx. Z224, went out JBC's chest, struck his right wrist, and made a small puncture wound in his left thigh. That bullet, CE-399, was recovered at Parkland Hospital and accounts for two (the other being CE-567 and CE-569) of the three bullets fired. It's that freaking fu****g simple, yet you dumb a** commie loving, wife beating, turncoat Oswald defenders just refuse to face the facts just as the dumb a** Flat Earth believers refuse to believe in what is the most obvious of facts. 

In order to support the myriad of theories to cast doubt on Oswald's guilt you fail each and every time in providing an alternate theory backed by reasonable evidence to support the theory that Oswald was not the shooter. Every time some half a***d unreasonable point is brought out by you guys it's countered by reasonable, effective, and verifiable evidence that completely shuts the door to further inquiry but you still persist because your life revolves around trying proving the unprovable by inventing unsupportable scenarios. It's your life and you can live it as you choose but you will never be at peace with yourselves because you're emotionally glued to a lost cause.
Why would anyone need a theory when we are not done laughing at the theory you support?  There's only one fact we know- Oswald is 100% innocent. Really, the way you should be thinking about this is to just prove Oswald did it. Guess what? You can't, so naturally, you are left looking like fool supporting some theory that was cobbled together by a bunch of incompetent yahoos. You need to understand how much of a sucker you are to believe such a silly story, but I imagine you fell for it when the authorities used the full name, so basically they had you at LEE HARVEY OSWALD and from there you fell in love with this whole ridiculous story. How embarrassing

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Oswald's Rifle Capability
« Reply #71 on: March 17, 2019, 10:49:40 PM »
Why would anyone need a theory when we are not done laughing at the theory you support?  There's only one fact we know- Oswald is 100% innocent. Really, the way you should be thinking about this is to just prove Oswald did it. Guess what? You can't, so naturally, you are left looking like fool supporting some theory that was cobbled together by a bunch of incompetent yahoos. You need to understand how much of a sucker you are to believe such a silly story, but I imagine you fell for it when the authorities used the full name, so basically they had you at LEE HARVEY OSWALD and from there you fell in love with this whole ridiculous story. How embarrassing

How embarrassing !

Especially embarrassing to those who think of themselves as infallible, superior, intellectuals who could never be duped....  But as some wise man observed a long time ago.... The more conceited and arrogant the man, the easier to it is to dupe him.     

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Oswald's Rifle Capability
« Reply #72 on: March 19, 2019, 01:41:50 AM »
It's that freaking fu****g simple, yet you dumb a** commie loving, wife beating, turncoat Oswald defenders just refuse to face the facts just as the dumb a** Flat Earth believers refuse to believe in what is the most obvious of facts. 
Seems that Oscar is developing serious emotional issues. I suggest obtaining a prescription for Prozac.
 

Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
Re: Oswald's Rifle Capability
« Reply #73 on: March 20, 2019, 05:13:30 PM »
The lack of same by the FBI testers is my point

Not true, the FBI testers couldn't even hit the target using the wonky scope.  Why didn't Oswald sight-in the scope when he was out shooting at leaves, as Jeanne deMohrenschildt claimed?

LHO - Hunter of Fascists Leaves

ETA: corrected, thx JI
« Last Edit: March 21, 2019, 12:08:29 AM by Jack Trojan »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Oswald's Rifle Capability
« Reply #74 on: March 20, 2019, 06:45:21 PM »
Not true, the FBI testers couldn't even hit the target using the wonky scope.  Why didn't Oswald sight-in the scope when he was out shooting at leaves, as Marina claimed?

LHO - Hunter of Fascists Leaves

I think that was actually Jeanne deMohrenschildt.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Oswald's Rifle Capability
« Reply #75 on: March 20, 2019, 09:06:10 PM »
Seems that Oscar is developing serious emotional issues. I suggest obtaining a prescription for Prozac.

LOL
So you've tried it yourself. Got it.

The hits just keep on comin'

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Oswald's Rifle Capability
« Reply #76 on: March 20, 2019, 09:37:20 PM »
LOL So you've tried it yourself. Got it. The hits just keep on comin'
Weak things---A bayou swamp...sinkholes...Bill Chapmans arguments.