JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Lack Of Damage To CE-399
Martin Weidmann:
--- Quote from: Tim Nickerson on April 19, 2020, 10:28:52 PM ---Near impossible? Where do you get that from?
--- End quote ---
The content of the letter you posted has nothing to do with risidue of a print being left behind when the print is lifted.
The FBI found not even a trace of a print on 11/23/63. When the rifle is returned to the DPD, Day has prints of Oswald's hand and palm available.
How easy would it be to stick such a print to the rifle and thus obtain the irregularities onto the lift?
John Iacoletti:
--- Quote from: Martin Weidmann on April 19, 2020, 11:18:02 PM ---The content of the letter you posted has nothing to do with risidue of a print being left behind when the print is lifted.
The FBI found not even a trace of a print on 11/23/63. When the rifle is returned to the DPD, Day has prints of Oswald's hand and palm available.
How easy would it be to stick such a print to the rifle and thus obtain the irregularities onto the lift?
--- End quote ---
Besides, let’s see the actual examination. We got a claim from Hoover and a smudge.
Jerry Freeman:
Quote from: Gerry Down on Today at 08:06:46 AM
--- Quote --- A dead body cant give a fingerprint. So the print was not lifted off Oswalds body after he died as Oliver Stone claimed in the JFK movie.
--- End quote ---
Nonsense. As usual you fail to research something before you post it. Oswald was not found in the desert months after he died.
http://crimeandclues.com/2013/01/31/fingerprinting-the-dead/
Walt Cakebread:
--- Quote from: Tim Nickerson on April 19, 2020, 10:28:52 PM ---Near impossible? Where do you get that from?
--- End quote ---
Oh Thank you , thank you. thank you...... for bringing up my favorite subject.....
This letter from Hoover's Mob is a gargantuan CROCK!..... And since you have posted it..... WHERE are he photos of the microscopic comparison between the lifted print and the metal barrel?? Have you forgotten that it was an FBI Lab man who testified that he had not been able to find any evidence that the area of the carcano where Day claimed that he had found and lifted the print had been subjected to finger print powder nor could he detect that a lift had been performed. He said he had never experienced any case in which a print had been lifted so completely that there was none of the print left behind....
Walt Cakebread:
--- Quote from: John Iacoletti on April 19, 2020, 11:42:09 PM ---Beside, let’s see the actual examination. We got a claim from Hoover and a smudge.
--- End quote ---
We got a claim from Hoover and a smudge.
That's absolutely right.... What has been presented to us by "experts" as Lee Oswald's Palm Print ...Is nothing but a damned unidentifiable SMUDGE.
I've said this many many times, but I'll say it again..... The barrel was only 5/8 " in diameter ( the diameter of a AA penlight battery) A tube that size is waaaaaaay too small to accept a adult mans palm print......
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version