JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Lack Of Damage To CE-399
Walt Cakebread:
--- Quote from: Andrew Mason on March 01, 2019, 06:59:33 PM ---Ok. You just made that up. I can make up an even more interesting possibility, but I prefer to stick to evidence.
--- End quote ---
Made WHAT? up, Andy... It is a FACT that CE 133A has been "RETOUCHED".... and that "retouching" also appears in the De M print which did not surface until February of 1967.
Andrew Mason:
--- Quote from: Walt Cakebread on March 04, 2019, 12:55:56 AM ---Made WHAT? up, Andy...
--- End quote ---
This part Wally:
"...Lee Oswald created these photos when he thought that the police would be chasing him after the hoax "attempt" to shoot General Walker. He thought the photo would be published because he had tried to shoot General Walker and Castro Agents would see it and accept that he really was a supporter of the revolution.
The hoax fell apart because the police didn't really believe that someone had tried to shoot Walker......"
That is the part you just made up.
--- Quote ---It is a FACT that CE 133A has been "RETOUCHED".... and that "retouching" also appears in the De M print which did not surface until February of 1967.
--- End quote ---
How is is it that anyone with expertise on photo retouching in 1963 concluded that it was not retouched? Photo retouching can always be identified when looking at the granular pattern of the print or negative. It might be disguised in the lithographic process for magazines but not on the prints or negatives.
Walt Cakebread:
--- Quote from: Andrew Mason on March 04, 2019, 01:25:12 AM ---This part Wally:
"...Lee Oswald created these photos when he thought that the police would be chasing him after the hoax "attempt" to shoot General Walker. He thought the photo would be published because he had tried to shoot General Walker and Castro Agents would see it and accept that he really was a supporter of the revolution.
The hoax fell apart because the police didn't really believe that someone had tried to shoot Walker......"
That is the part you just made up.How is is it that anyone with expertise on photo retouching in 1963 concluded that it was not retouched? Photo retouching can always be identified when looking at the granular pattern of the print or negative. It might be disguised in the lithographic process for magazines but not on the prints or negatives.
--- End quote ---
Andy I'm no photo expert by any stretch...But the experts at LIFE and other publications said the photo had been retouched before they ever eceived them...and they also did a bit of reouching themselves when the published the photos.
But a person doesn't heed to be an expert to see that what appears to be a sling or carrying strap on the rifle is nothing but some artists ( LHO) rendition of a sling.
John Iacoletti:
--- Quote from: Walt Cakebread on March 04, 2019, 01:55:01 AM ---Andy I'm no photo expert by any stretch...But the experts at LIFE and other publications said the photo had been retouched before they ever eceived them...
--- End quote ---
You made that up too.
Bill Chapman:
The byp used for the Life magazine cover was retouched.
Not surprising, since virtually all published images undergo the process.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version