Matthew Smith The Second Plot

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Matthew Smith The Second Plot  (Read 35795 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Matthew Smith The Second Plot
« Reply #28 on: February 11, 2019, 09:51:36 PM »

     So he said. Let's get that out of the way. McDonald first told the Dallas papers that the revolver 'misfired'..no mention of his thumb..... McDonald lied. 'Oh really?' Yeah.
Yeah he did. One example- McDonald claimed that Oswald stood up and said ''This is it". However in testimony his own police buddy reported that it was in fact McDonald who said it......
*********************************************************************** 
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/hawkins.htm
There were other McDonald 'irregularities'.  'Well' is a deep subject for such a shallow mind as yours.
Rumor...."a currently circulating story or report of uncertain or doubtful truth."
 I wonder why you would really care anyway. JFK was not your president. I do not know who the shooters were, but feel some day it will be revealed.

However in testimony his own police buddy reported that it was in fact McDonald who said it......

Is Ray Dawkins the 'police buddy' you're talking about?

Mr. HAWKINS. He walked from the right aisle and came in from the person's right. I was about three rows from--still in the same aisle, on the left aisle and about three rows from McDonald and Oswald when I heard him say, "I've got him," or "This is it," or some words to that effect.

--------------------------------------------
Maybe McDonald said I've got him
Maybe Oswald said this is it

Seems Dawkins heard both
« Last Edit: February 11, 2019, 10:05:30 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Matthew Smith The Second Plot
« Reply #29 on: February 11, 2019, 11:46:45 PM »
It's post's like the above that really emphasise how low the debating quality on this forum has become. It's a crying shame to see such a formerly great forum sink like this. No reply required.

It's post's like the above that really emphasise how low the debating quality on this forum has become.

Apparently the fact that you contribute NOTHING to this forum escapes you.....

Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: Matthew Smith The Second Plot
« Reply #30 on: February 11, 2019, 11:53:14 PM »
"they won't discover the rumors of any plot"

Show me where I asked for rumours. I clearly asked for proof that anyone besides the shooter knew that an attempt was going to made on Kennedy that day.

Well?
Another shooter would know

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Matthew Smith The Second Plot
« Reply #31 on: February 12, 2019, 06:40:08 AM »
Another shooter would know

You missed the part where I said prove someone other than the shooter knew there was to be an attempt made on Kennedy that day.

You're rather dim, aren't you...
« Last Edit: February 12, 2019, 06:45:25 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Matthew Smith The Second Plot
« Reply #32 on: February 12, 2019, 11:23:33 PM »
The hammer hit the web of skin on MacDonald's hand between his
thumb and forefinger.

And amazingly it also hit Paul Bentley's hand at the same time.  Were McDonald and Bentley holding hands?

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Matthew Smith The Second Plot
« Reply #33 on: February 13, 2019, 01:49:45 AM »
Maybe Oswald said this is it
 Seems Dawkins heard both
Quote
Mr. BALL. Did you hear Oswald say anything?
Mr. HAWKINS. Not at that time; no, sir; I did not.
You might go learn how to read.
Quote
You're rather dim, aren't you...
Says one with a subdued mind of it's own. Pay no attention to Silly Willy.
 

Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: Matthew Smith The Second Plot
« Reply #34 on: February 13, 2019, 06:45:59 AM »
You missed the part where I said prove someone other than the shooter knew there was to be an attempt made on Kennedy that day.

You're rather dim, aren't you...
Oops! I forgot something.
You said "someone other than the shooter" Where do you believe  "the shooter" was positioned?