JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate

Altered History: Doug Horne parts 1-5 on You Tube

(1/6) > >>

Mike Orr:
I've been listening to the 5 part series on You Tube by Doug Horne , Altered History: Deceit and Deception in the JFK Assassination Medical Evidence . This series is very good and it seems to fill in some holes about the Assassination of JFK . Doug Horne served on the Staff of the Assassination Records Review Board. I've listened to parts 1 thru 3 and there are a lot of interesting points made in this series. Listening to this is like reading a good book that you can't put down . Give it a listen . You won't be disappointed . I believe so much of what Doug Horne says in this 5 part series . The details that come out in this series will blow you away . You be the Judge .

Dillon Rankine:

--- Quote from: Mike Orr on January 30, 2018, 03:46:44 AM ---I've been listening to the 5 part series on You Tube by Doug Horne , Altered History: Deceit and Deception in the JFK Assassination Medical Evidence . This series is very good and it seems to fill in some holes about the Assassination of JFK . Doug Horne served on the Staff of the Assassination Records Review Board. I've listened to parts 1 thru 3 and there are a lot of interesting points made in this series. Listening to this is like reading a good book that you can't put down . Give it a listen . You won't be disappointed . I believe so much of what Doug Horne says in this 5 part series . The details that come out in this series will blow you away . You be the Judge .

--- End quote ---

Watched all 6 parts some years ago. Horne?s scientific illiteracy is quite astounding and so naturally is his incredibly absurd ?solution? to the ?problems? in the medical evidence.

Martin Weidmann:

--- Quote from: Dillon Rankine on January 30, 2018, 08:37:22 AM ---Watched all 6 parts some years ago. Horne?s scientific illiteracy is quite astounding and so naturally is his incredibly absurd ?solution? to the ?problems? in the medical evidence.

--- End quote ---

And your qualifications to make such a determination are what, exactly?

Dillon Rankine:

--- Quote from: Martin Weidmann on January 30, 2018, 09:10:51 AM ---And your qualifications to make such a determination are what, exactly?

--- End quote ---

Qualifications? It impossible to read books and educate oneself now? Try the book by someone who is qualified: Charles G. Wilber, PhD, (1974) Medicolegal Investigation of the President John F. Kennedy Murder. Or indeed DiMaio?s Gunshot Wounds. Horne is not qualified in the matters upon which he pontificates either (that is, he bears no qualifications in forensic pathology nor does it seem any knowledge) so if that?s your standard then why bother with his claims?

Paul May:
Duncan MacPherson, author of ? Bullet Penetration? and wound ballistic authority said it best and this is from a man with no interest in the JFK event but was asked to look at the ballistics:  ?the major frustrating feature of the Kennedy assassination phenomenon is the willingness of people to pretend to  talk authoritatively on subjects they know absolutely nothing about, especially things related to firearms?.

This happens in every single forum/blog on the internet. Tiring.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page