JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Which Station Waggon's Featured on 11/22/63?
Lee Wotton:
--- Quote from: Walt Cakebread on January 29, 2018, 01:08:36 PM ---Rob, LOOK at the photos of Detective Day checking the CARCANO rifle for fingerprints behind a TSBD window that is brightly lit by sunshine.
Day clearly is examining the carcano and the shadows indicate that the time is about 1:45 pm ......
Learn to face the truth.....Roger Craig lied about the carcano being a Mauser. And it was merely his ego that caused him to lie. He had made a mistake in believing Seymour Weitzman who mistakenly identified the carcano as a Mauser. Weitzman admitted that he was in error...but the egotistical Craig could not admit an error..... so rather than admit his error he embellished the tale in an attempt to make it believable.
Most folks can see Roger Craig as he was....but there are a few who suffer from the same affliction that caused Roger Craig to lie... and those folks will not accept facts that refute some theory they embrace.
--- End quote ---
Walt, I refer to my earlier post asking for the facts cited that prove Craig was lying? I've still never seen any?
John Iacoletti:
--- Quote from: John Anderson on January 27, 2018, 03:26:59 AM ---A good number of people believe the steel in the twin towers was vaporised by a ray gun.
--- End quote ---
Who?
John Iacoletti:
--- Quote from: John Mytton on January 28, 2018, 02:50:44 AM ---Bingo, you have absolutely no evidence that any conspirators smuggled a Carcano, Mauser or any other type of rifle onto the 6th floor,
--- End quote ---
You have absolutely no evidence that Oswald smuggled any rifle onto the 6th floor.
"Oswald's rifle". LOL.
John Iacoletti:
Howard Brennan's eventual identification after his "change of heart".
Handwriting on Klein's order coupon and PO box form and partial palm print that showed up at the FBI a week later on a card.
Limousine bullet fragments matched to rifle
Expended cartridge shells matched to rifle
Large brown paper bag with Oswald's prints
Palm print and fingerprint in sniper's nest
The ballistics implicate a weapon, not a person. It cannot be proven that the large paper bag was the one Frazier saw or that Oswald carried it into the building or that it was in the sniper's nest when it was first discovered or that it ever contained a rifle. And prints on boxes in the building are not remarkable because he worked there and would be expected to handle boxes.
So we're left with an inconsistent identification from a witness who was influenced by television and newspaper reports, a questionable reappearing partial print, and unscientific and biased analysis of two block letters on a photo of a microfilm copy of a two-inch order coupon.
What exactly is it that you find "overwhelming"? That he left his wedding ring behind?
John Iacoletti:
--- Quote from: Walt Cakebread on January 28, 2018, 08:51:24 PM ---Answer....Three of Hoover's mafia dons were in the theater at the time the Dallas police arrested that dastardly culprit who snuck into the theater without buying a ticket.
--- End quote ---
They didn't even have any evidence of that. The DPD were batting a thousand that day...
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version