JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate

Which Station Waggon's Featured on 11/22/63?

<< < (6/10) > >>

Lee Wotton:

--- Quote from: Gary Craig on January 28, 2018, 03:18:20 PM ---"and matching fibers"

LOL

Fibers from a shirt he wasn't wearing.

And no fibers from the blanket the Carcano was allegedly wrapped in for months.

LOL

"the package and the contents of the package"

You mean the alleged gun case that contained zero forensic evidence of ever containing the TSBD

Carcano, broken down or not.

--- End quote ---

Gary, thanks for your post.  I agree, a trial of LHO would have found him not guilty.  The evidence was circumstantial at best and not good enough for a conviction.  Why do people think he was killed? A failed trial would prove conspiracy.

Lee Wotton:
All, thank you doe your posts but going back to the OP does anyone have any information on station waggons or photos of them in and around DP on 11/22

Walt Cakebread:

--- Quote from: Lee Wotton on January 28, 2018, 04:17:53 PM ---Gary, thanks for your post.  I agree, a trial of LHO would have found him not guilty.  The evidence was circumstantial at best and not good enough for a conviction.  Why do people think he was killed? A failed trial would prove conspiracy.

--- End quote ---

 The evidence was circumstantial at best and not good enough for a conviction.  Why do people think he was killed? A failed trial would prove conspiracy.

Chief Curry admitted that they had no solid evidence against Lee Oswald......

A failed trial would prove conspiracy.

Hoover and LBJ could not afford to allow Lee Oswald to live long enough to go to trial .......  They were soiling their skivvies when they learned that Lee hadn't been killed in the TSBD.....

Lee Wotton:

--- Quote from: Walt Cakebread on January 28, 2018, 04:37:49 PM ---
 The evidence was circumstantial at best and not good enough for a conviction.  Why do people think he was killed? A failed trial would prove conspiracy.

Chief Curry admitted that they had no solid evidence against Lee Oswald......

A failed trial would prove conspiracy.

Hoover and LBJ could not afford to allow Lee Oswald to live long enough to go to trial .......  They were soiling their skivvies when they learned that Lee hadn't been killed in the TSBD.....

--- End quote ---

Totally agree Walt, the FBI tried to get Curry to retract his statement that Oswald was known to the FBI

Paul McBrearty:

--- Quote from: Lee Wotton on January 28, 2018, 04:17:53 PM ---I agree, a trial of LHO would have found him not guilty.  The evidence was circumstantial at best and not good enough for a conviction.  Why do people think he was killed? A failed trial would prove conspiracy.

--- End quote ---

A trial of Lee Harvey Oswald would have found him not guilty. How wrong you are. Typical conspiracy hobbyist that has a compulsion to point the finger of blame at everyone other than Oswald.
The evidence that Lee Harvey Oswald shot JFK is substantial both direct and indirect when put together as a whole and overwhelming. The evidence that Oswald shot JD Tippit is ironclad. Any competent jury would have found him guilty with more than enough evidence for a conviction. He was shot by Jack Ruby because like Oswald, Ruby was a lone nut looking for a place in the limelight.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version