Name your shooter

[Michael Carney]

Why he was killed...........

Robert Kennedy hounded Carlos and other mob members in the senate hearings dragging several into their hearings and make comments like “I thought only little girls giggled Mr. Hoffa”

Joe Kennedy asks for the help of the mob to get his son Jack elected president of the United States and he wins by a slim margin. Was the mobs help enough to swing the vote to JFK, who knows, the only thing that matters is that the mob thought so.

Bobby Kennedy has Carlos Marcello basically kidnapped and flown out of the county to ultimately be kicked out of a bus in the middle of the jungle in their florshiem  shoes to fend for themselves where they could have been killed and did suffer some injuries.

I am not sure if the mob took offence with the way Frank Sinatra was treated by JFK after Frank spent a small fortune building a helicopter pad for when the President was going to come and visit and then all of a sudden JFK turns his back on Frank with no explanation. Frank was so pissed he couldn’t see straight, I think it was said that he was so angry he took a sludge hammer to the concrete helipad.

[Michael Carney]

No, Marcello was down in Central America for weeks or months.

[Michael Carney]

So “name your shooter” is like asking the name of the mechanic working on your car, what difference does it make, he is just following orders from up above.    He is not responsible for the planning, or even know why he is doing it, he is just doing what he is paid to do.
I have stated “why” in post 77 of this thread and one of the “who”. I am not sure if this is the thread to say more, I hate it when people drift off topic, kind of like what I have done but I had to put in my two cents worth.

[Bill Chapman]

No, you’re assuming that Euins saw Oswald and desperately trying to make what he described fit.

Nah, the head Euins saw happened to match Oswald's re the 2.5" area back of the hairline.
That only proves the shooter would have to be sporting a similar 'do.

[John Iacoletti]

Nah, the head Euins saw happened to match Oswald's re the 2.5" area back of the hairline.

Who measured Oswald's hairline?  You?

Euins didn't even come up with the 2.5".  That was Specter.

That only proves the shooter would have to be sporting a similar 'do.

Except he said "bald spot".

Also there's this:

Mr. SPECTER. Now, did you get a very good look at that man, Amos?
Mr. EUINS. No, sir; I did not.

Isn't that exactly what you used to try to discredit Frazier's observation about the bag?  Double standard?

[Bill Chapman]

Who measured Oswald's hairline?  You?
>>> Who measured the bag? You?

Euins didn't even come up with the 2.5".  That was Specter.
>>> Euins agreed with the estimation. And physically pointed out the area on his own head*

Except he said "bald spot".
>>> Semantics

Also there's this:

Mr. SPECTER. Now, did you get a very good look at that man, Amos?
Mr. EUINS. No, sir; I did not.

Isn't that exactly what you used to try to discredit Frazier's observation about the bag?  Double standard?
>>> Show us where I;m discrediting Frazier. Hiding the full size of the bag would work in Buell's case since he kept repeating he wasn't paying any attention to it.

Amos described the spot on the head in the window no matter if you like it or not

Mr. EUINS. I seen a bald spot on this man's head, trying to look out the window. He had a bald spot on his head. I was looking at the bald spot

Mr. SPECTER. How far back did the bald spot on his head go?
*Mr. EUINS. I would say about right along in here.
Mr. SPECTER. Indicating about 2 1/2 inches above where you hairline is. Is that about what you are saying?
Mr. EUINS. Yes, sir; right along in here.
Mr. SPECTER. Now, did you get a very good look at that man, Amos?
Mr. EUINS. No, sir; I did not.

He got enough of a good look at the head to describe your anal-retentive description of 'bald spot' accurately

[John Iacoletti]

>>> Who measured the bag? You?

Fail.  Frazier said the bag was "around 2 feet, give and take a few inches".   Euins never said anything about a hairline or 2.5".  But how do you even know that 2.5" fits Oswald's hairline?

>>> Euins agreed with the estimation. And physically pointed out the area on his own head*

So you've seen video of Euins' deposition?

Except he said "bald spot".
>>> Semantics

So now who's the one deciding what witnesses really meant?  Giant hypocrite.

Amos described the spot on the head in the window no matter if you like it or not

Yes, he described a spot on the head.  You're the one twisting what he said to mean Oswald's receding hairline.

He got enough of a good look at the head to describe your anal-retentive description of 'bald spot' accurately

More hypocrisy.  Frazier got a way closer look at the bag than Euins got of the person's head.  And you don't know that it describes Oswald's head accurately -- you're just assuming that it must.