Name your shooter

[Bill Chapman]

Fail.  Frazier said the bag was "around 2 feet, give and take a few inches". 
>>> Frazier had a vested interest in what size he reported. Randle says the package almost touched the ground. A 35" package carried straight down by the side as described by Randle leaves said 35" package 4" from the ground in my tests. I'm 3" taller than Oswald so that confirms Randle's 'almost touching the ground' statement. That leaves quite a gap to cover for a 18" to 26" package to appear to be 'almost touching the ground'.

Euins never said anything about a hairline or 2.5". 
>> Yeah, he did. He agreed with it.

But how do you even know that 2.5" fits Oswald's hairline?
>>> Why ask me? Euins agreed with the estimate

So you've seen video of Euins' deposition?
>> Did you read Euins' testimony?

So now who's the one deciding what witnesses really meant?  Giant hypocrite.
>>> Stop twisting... I'm talking about YOUR semantics, Sparky...

Yes, he described a spot on the head.  You're the one twisting what he said to mean Oswald's receding hairline.
>>> Euins indicated the front of the head... unless the shooter was trying one of those trick shots. But nobody saw a mirror.

More hypocrisy.  Frazier got a way closer look at the bag than Euins got of the person's head.
>>> Frazier wasn't paying attention. Euins was. 

And you don't know that it describes Oswald's head accurately -- you're just assuming that it must.
>>> Coulda. Euins agreed with the location & the estimation. Now go find a shooter with a hairline to match..

[Zeon Mason]

Malcolm Wallace, since one of his fingerprints was left behind at the SE window, with 35 points matched by 30 year veteran
 expert fingerprint examiner, Nathan Darby.

Malcolm was having a difficult time seeing the target, however, since he was not wearing any glasses, as per Amos Euins, so Malcom had to fire 3 shots in 4.8 seconds, as heard and described by Harold Norman on the 5th floor, right beneath the SN window.

Unfortunately, some other experts have declared 35 points match can be nullified by irregular dissimilar points between, and also, because no other shooter using MC rifle under same condition as SN boxes in window etc, has been able shoot 3 rounds in 4.8 seconds and get a head shot

there must be some OTHER shooter with some OTHER type rifle, or there were TWO shooters, one of them having a rifle that looked to Arnold Rowland to be a 30.06 hunting rifle with a large scope that Rowland could see from over 100 yds distance.

or Oswald is an incredible shooter but was suffering from and IQ of only 108 and or had some mental disorder that explains all the other idiotic choices, like not wearing gloves and having to wipe his rifle down with a rag instead, and forgetting about that palm print he left on the barrel, and forgetting to get rid that fake Alek Hidell ID card and dropping that with his wallet at the Tippet shooting scene.

[Mike Orr]

James Files said he made the frontal head shot that blew out the back of JFK's head, but who made the frontal neck shot on JFK ? Files said he fired one shot and that shot was the shot that hit JFK's right temple and it blew the right rear back of JFK's head off leaving a hole about the size of a baseball . The trunk lid and the back of the car had blood and brain matter all over it . Motorcycle Policeman Bobby Hargis had blood and brain matter all over him , so much that he thought he might have been hit . We have no clue who shot through the windshield and made an entrance wound in JFK's throat but made no exit , just like the shot in the back that made no exit !

[John Iacoletti]

Fail.  Frazier said the bag was "around 2 feet, give and take a few inches". 
>>> Frazier had a vested interest in what size he reported. Randle says the package almost touched the ground. A 35" package carried straight down by the side as described by Randle leaves said 35" package 4" from the ground in my tests.

Let me guess.  Your "tests" were contrived to make a 35" inch package almost touch the ground, right? I can make a two-foot bag almost touch the ground too if I hold it the right way.  Are you forgetting that Linnie Mae did her own test?

Oh yeah, how does one fit a 40-inch rifle in your 35-inch bag and fold the top over?

Euins never said anything about a hairline or 2.5". 
>> Yeah, he did. He agreed with it.

It was a leading question.  And Specter had a vested interest in what size he reported.

But how do you even know that 2.5" fits Oswald's hairline?
>>> Why ask me? Euins agreed with the estimate

No, I'm asking you if Specter's 2.5" estimate of what Euins was demonstrating on his own head actually matches Oswald's hairline.  If the size of Oswald's hairline gap is not 2.5" then all bets are off.

>> Did you read Euins' testimony?

Yep.  "Right along in here" doesn't mean much in written text.

>>> Stop twisting... I'm talking about YOUR semantics, Sparky...

No, you're being transparently hypocritical and applying a different standard to yourself.

>>> Euins indicated the front of the head...

..and that means receding hairline, why, exactly?  Just because you want it to be?

unless the shooter was trying one of those trick shots. But nobody saw a mirror.

Another useless attempt at being "clever".  Nobody saw a receding hairline either.  Or Oswald.

>>> Frazier wasn't paying attention. Euins was. 

Mr. SPECTER. Now, did you get a very good look at that man, Amos?
Mr. EUINS. No, sir; I did not.

>>> Coulda. Euins agreed with the location & the estimation. Now go find a shooter with a hairline to match..

Go find a shooter with a bald spot.  "Coulda meant Oswald" is hardly conclusive proof of anything.

[Bill Chapman]

There you go again, stating assumptions as facts.

Nah... just musing

[Ray Mitcham]

Nah... just musing

Certainly not "amusing".

[Bill Chapman]

Let me guess.  Your "tests" were contrived to make a 35" inch package almost touch the ground, right?
>>> Watch your mouth. And you guess way too much. And do the math yourself. I held the 35" object straight down at my side and right near the top, with my arm at full length.

I can make a two-foot bag almost touch the ground too if I hold it the right way.
>>> Show us that little trick. Show us where I used a 2ft bag. And just how many inches is ‘close’ to you… or are you JAQ again. The ‘right way’ has the bag almost touching the ground.

Are you forgetting that Linnie Mae did her own test?
>>> Is she Oswald’s height and did her 2ft bag almost touch the ground?

Oh yeah, how does one fit a 40-inch rifle in your 35-inch bag and fold the top over
>>> What bag? My 35” narrow object represents the length of a broken-down Carcano.

It was a leading question.  And Specter had a vested interest in what size he reported.
>> Specter had a vested interest on how a  bag seen to almost touch the ground could now be the size of somebody’s lunch bag.

No, I'm asking you if Specter's 2.5" estimate of what Euins was demonstrating on his own head actually matches Oswald's hairline.  If the size of Oswald's hairline gap is not 2.5" then all bets are off.
>>> No. It’s an estimation. Plus thinning hair in strong sunlight will reveal more skin making the spot appear larger.

Yep.  "Right along in here" doesn't mean much in written text.
>>> In isolation, no. In this case it locates the spot.

No, you're being transparently hypocritical and applying a different standard to yourself.
>>> Point out any hypocrisy on my part.

..and that means receding hairline, why, exactly?  Just because you want it to be?
>>> Take a look at Oswald’s hairline over the years and tell us his hairline wasn’t in retreat. And plenty of mention of ‘receding hair’ re Oswald on google groups over the years.

Another useless attempt at being "clever".  Nobody saw a receding hairline either.  Or Oswald.
>>> And yet you called my Satan/Oswald bit 'creative' the other day. Anyway, stop splitting hairs: you brainiacs keep playing this ‘bald spot’-dictionary-meaning thing and I’m going to mock you.

Mr. SPECTER. Now, did you get a very good look at that man, Amos?
Mr. EUINS. No, sir; I did not.
>>> He’s never said that he could ID anyone, only that he saw a white spot on a head 

Go find a shooter with a bald spot.  "Coulda meant Oswald" is hardly conclusive proof of anything.
>>> That’s your job. We have a guy with the spot Euins described. Better not show up with an sn shooter completely bald or with an Afro is what I’m sayin’.