Was Kennedy's Jacket bunched on Elm Street?

[Eddie Haymaker]

Again comeback - terrible

you gonna have to work at this Johnny

you are not good at this.

Did you want to speak to GC's testimony regarding the shots?

What say you?

[John Mytton]

Again comeback - terrible

you gonna have to work at this Johnny

you are not good at this.

Did you want to speak to GC's testimony regarding the shots?

What say you?

Again comeback - terrible

Again your opinion - worthless.

you gonna have to work at this Johnny

I'm still waiting for you to refute the OP, but all you want to do is show us is how depressingly unfunny you are.

you are not good at this.

So to be good at this I have to post pictures of "donkeys" and that's how you think you got good? What a wanker!

Did you want to speak to GC's testimony regarding the shots?

How about you refute the OP, then we can discuss more stuff that you don't understand.

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

It's not a competition, it only happened one way.

JohnM

It's not a competition,

Well, it seems to you it is. Why else would you have written;

you already admitted defeat,

Sorry Eddie, no more of your unprovable worthless assertions, you already admitted defeat, Fcuk off!

JohnM

You can't keep up the pretense for long, can you now, Johnny?

Just saying?..

[Oscar Navarro]

It's no longer the SBT it's the SBFact.

[Royell Storing]

It's no longer the SBT it's the SBFact.

    Just like the "THEORY of relativity", until such time as the SBT can be replicated/duplicated in reality, it can Not be labeled as "Fact".

[Martin Weidmann]

It's no longer the SBT it's the SBFact.

Something that's based on all sorts of assumptions somehow is a fact to you? 

[Royell Storing]

Something that's based on all sorts of assumptions somehow is a fact to you? 

    These are the lengths they have to go in order to sell the SBT. Falsely declaring Harry Potter and The Matrix worthy material as being "Fact".