USPS workers screwing things up i.e..LHO receiving c2766

[Oscar Navarro]

Quote from: Steve Howsley on Today at 10:56:57 PM
And the evidence is?

It's easy to pick a prominent name or two without evidence. What about a name or two from the middle of the pack or a couple from the front line?


What's wrong with your power of reasoning?   It as plain as the new moon in a clear sky, that the official tale that LBJ and Hoover created for us gullible suckers, is the same type of big lie that became the way of life in Nazi Germany.

Whoa ther' padner! You mean to tell me we've been living under a National Socialist regime for over fifty years? Where are the death camps, Cakebread?

[Steve Howsley]

What's wrong with your power of reasoning?   It as plain as the new moon in a clear sky, that the official tale that LBJ and Hoover created for us gullible suckers, is the same type of big lie that became the way of life in Nazi Germany.

You can willingly place yourself in a group labelled 'us gullible suckers'.

IMO Hoover is guilty of putting his arse covering on equal terms with conducting an open investigation and for that he will always be a bad guy in my book but dragging in comparisons with Nazi Germany is just a tad OTT. 

So do you have some names of players from the middle of the deck and the front line? It's been 55 years now so surely the CTers can finally lay an egg on this one.

[Walt Cakebread]

You can willingly place yourself in a group labelled 'us gullible suckers'.

IMO Hoover is guilty of putting his arse covering on equal terms with conducting an open investigation and for that he will always be a bad guy in my book but dragging in comparisons with Nazi Germany is just a tad OTT. 

So do you have some names of players from the middle of the deck and the front line? It's been 55 years now so surely the CTers can finally lay an egg on this one.

As a matter of fact I do have names that were a bit further from the top.... But I'm not playing your game...When you extract your head, and man up to the truth, you'll learn them by yourself.

[Steve Howsley]

As a matter of fact I do have names that were a bit further from the top.... But I'm not playing your game...When you extract your head, and man up to the truth, you'll learn them by yourself.

Sorry Walt. That statement says to me that you've got nothing in the way of names. That's OK. I didn't expect you to provide any.

[Walt Cakebread]

Sorry Walt. That statement says to me that you've got nothing in the way of names. That's OK. I didn't expect you to provide any.

Nice cop out Mr Howsley ....   Wake up fool.....

[Oscar Navarro]

Nice cop out Mr Howsley ....   Wake up fool.....

Walt "Mr. T" Cakebread

[Rob Caprio]

Oswald ordered a rifle and it was sent to his PO Box.  All he had to do was take the slip placed in his box to a clerk who handed him his package.  CTers have argued it couldn't be delivered because the Hidell name was not listed on his PO authorization form.  But that form was lost and Oswald did list Hidell on his NO PO box form.  If CTers were correct, however, then the logical next sequence in this pedantic interpretation of post office procedure would have been for the rifle to be returned to Klein's.  It was not.  CTers could care less about the implications of their theories due to an inability or unwillingness to apply logic to any event that results in an outcome they don't like.  If by asserting that A did not happen, it must result in B occurring, then the absence of B occurring undermines the original claim.  Klein's sent a rifle to Oswald's PO Box.  It can't be accounted for in any way except as being received by Oswald.  If post office procedures had precluded delivery, it would have been sent back.  It was not.  If there were any doubt, there are pictures of Oswald holding the rifle, his prints are on the rifle sent to his PO box (same serial #) etc.   And when all is said and done, if there had been some document Oswald signed or clerk who could remember giving him the rifle, CTers would claim they were lying or forged.  The game never ends when any evidence of Oswald's guilt is suspect for that reason alone.  We would just add a postal clerk's name to all the others who lied to frame Oswald.

LNers like you always claim that LHO "could have" received the rifle and pistol, but what you don't do is cite any supporting evidence to show that he did receive the weapons. Why is that?