USPS workers screwing things up i.e..LHO receiving c2766

[Bill Chapman]

When did she say "before that day"?

Where did I say she said that

[Walt Cakebread]

Detective Studebaker made a map of the sixth floor and recorded the locations of the various pieces of evidence on that map.  He made precise measurements and recorded the measurements on the map.   He recorded that the rifle was 15 feet 4 inches south of the north wall of the TSBD....   ( LOOK at the map) 
https://zmail04-mta.peak.org/service/home/~/?auth=co&loc=en_US&id=6209&part=2

Deputy Boone said that the rifle was about 8 feet south of the south end of the partition on the east side of the stairway.  Boone's estimate fits very nicely with Studebakers actual measurement.   Studebakers measurement places the rifle about 5 feet from the row of boxes that formed the E / W/ aisle at the top of the stairs....That rifle was NOT jammed down between boxes ....It was laying on the floor just as Seymour Weitzman said.  " I got down on the floor and shined my light beneath a pallet and I saw the rifle laying on the floor"

If  the 5 foot 9 inch, Lee Oswald had placed the carcano on the floor beneath the pallet stacked with boxes of books he would have had to have laid down on top of the rows of boxes.   The rifle was found by Deputy Boone 15 feet 4 inches south of the north wall or about 5 feet south of the aisle at the top of the stairs.   Lee Oswald could not have reached across that 5 foot span and placed the rifle down on the floor behind boxes that were stacked four feet high. 

[Walt Cakebread]

Stick to your original claim: Boone confirmed the photo posted is the way he found the rifle. It is NOT a recreation.

Boone testimony

(...)

Mr. Ball - Where was the rifle located on the floor, general location?
Mr. BOONE - Well, it was almost--the stairwell is in the corner of the building, something like this, and there is a wall coming up here, making one side of the stairwell with the building acting as the other two sides. And from that, it was almost directly in front or about 8 feet south, I guess, it would be, from that partition wall that made up the stairwell.

it was almost directly in front or about 8 feet south, I guess, it would be, from that partition wall that made up the stairwell.

Mr. BALL - The rifle was about 3 feet from the--
Mr. BOONE - Yes, sir; behind a row of boxes. There was a row of boxes that came across there. Then the rifle was behind that first row of boxes.
Mr. BALL - I show you 514. Is that the way it looked when you saw it?
Mr. BOONE - Yes.
Mr. BALL - Is that the way it was when the picture was taken?
Mr. BOONE - Yes; I believe so.
Mr. BALL - This shows the rifle as you saw it, does it?
Mr. BOONE - That is right. Then you could kneel down over here and see that it had a scope, a telescopic sight on it, by looking down underneath the boxes.

(...)

Bill Crapman posted this; and I have underlined the part of Boone's testimony that I'd like to focus on...

Stick to your original claim: Boone confirmed the photo posted is the way he found the rifle. It is NOT a recreation.

Boone testimony

(...)

Mr. Ball - Where was the rifle located on the floor, general location?
Mr. BOONE - Well, it was almost--the stairwell is in the corner of the building, something like this, and there is a wall coming up here, making one side of the stairwell with the building acting as the other two sides. And from that, it was almost directly in front or about 8 feet south, I guess, it would be, from that partition wall that made up the stairwell.
Mr. BALL - The rifle was about 3 feet from the--
Mr. BOONE - Yes, sir; behind a row of boxes. There was a row of boxes that came across there. Then the rifle was behind that first row of boxes.
Mr. BALL - I show you 514. Is that the way it looked when you saw it?
Mr. BOONE - Yes.
Mr. BALL - Is that the way it was when the picture was taken?
Mr. BOONE - Yes; I believe so.
Mr. BALL - This shows the rifle as you saw it, does it?
Mr. BOONE - That is right. Then you could kneel down over here and see that it had a scope, a telescopic sight on it, by looking down underneath the boxes.

What's very interesting to me is the FACT that Eugene Boone specifically stated that the rifle was about EIGHT FEET south of the partition that was the east wall of the stairs ( a partition to prevent someone from falling down into the stair well.)    And in the very next question Mr. Ball changes that distance to 3 feet.....

[Walt Cakebread]

Bill Crapman posted this; and I have underlined the part of Boone's testimony that I'd like to focus on...

Stick to your original claim: Boone confirmed the photo posted is the way he found the rifle. It is NOT a recreation.

Boone testimony

(...)

Mr. Ball - Where was the rifle located on the floor, general location?
Mr. BOONE - Well, it was almost--the stairwell is in the corner of the building, something like this, and there is a wall coming up here, making one side of the stairwell with the building acting as the other two sides. And from that, it was almost directly in front or about 8 feet south, I guess, it would be, from that partition wall that made up the stairwell.
Mr. BALL - The rifle was about 3 feet from the--
Mr. BOONE - Yes, sir; behind a row of boxes. There was a row of boxes that came across there. Then the rifle was behind that first row of boxes.
Mr. BALL - I show you 514. Is that the way it looked when you saw it?
Mr. BOONE - Yes.
Mr. BALL - Is that the way it was when the picture was taken?
Mr. BOONE - Yes; I believe so.
Mr. BALL - This shows the rifle as you saw it, does it?
Mr. BOONE - That is right. Then you could kneel down over here and see that it had a scope, a telescopic sight on it, by looking down underneath the boxes.

What's very interesting to me is the FACT that Eugene Boone specifically stated that the rifle was about EIGHT FEET south of the partition that was the east wall of the stairs ( a partition to prevent someone from falling down into the stair well.)    And in the very next question Mr. Ball changes that distance to 3 feet.....

Mr Crapman... You posted this:

Stick to your original claim: Boone confirmed the photo posted is the way he found the rifle. It is NOT a recreation.

Boone testimony

(...)

Mr. Ball - Where was the rifle located on the floor, general location?
Mr. BOONE - Well, it was almost--the stairwell is in the corner of the building, something like this, and there is a wall coming up here, making one side of the stairwell with the building acting as the other two sides. And from that, it was almost directly in front or about 8 feet south, I guess, it would be, from that partition wall that made up the stairwell.
Mr. BALL - The rifle was about 3 feet from the--
Mr. BOONE - Yes, sir; behind a row of boxes. There was a row of boxes that came across there. Then the rifle was behind that first row of boxes.
Mr. BALL - I show you 514. Is that the way it looked when you saw it?
Mr. BOONE - Yes.
Mr. BALL - Is that the way it was when the picture was taken?
Mr. BOONE - Yes; I believe so.
Mr. BALL - This shows the rifle as you saw it, does it?
Mr. BOONE - That is right. Then you could kneel down over here and see that it had a scope, a telescopic sight on it, by looking down underneath the boxes.

Where did you copy it from?     

[Walt Cakebread]

Bill Crapman posted this; and I have underlined the part of Boone's testimony that I'd like to focus on...

Stick to your original claim: Boone confirmed the photo posted is the way he found the rifle. It is NOT a recreation.

Boone testimony

(...)

Mr. Ball - Where was the rifle located on the floor, general location?
Mr. BOONE - Well, it was almost--the stairwell is in the corner of the building, something like this, and there is a wall coming up here, making one side of the stairwell with the building acting as the other two sides. And from that, it was almost directly in front or about 8 feet south, I guess, it would be, from that partition wall that made up the stairwell.
Mr. BALL - The rifle was about 3 feet from the--
Mr. BOONE - Yes, sir; behind a row of boxes. There was a row of boxes that came across there. Then the rifle was behind that first row of boxes.
Mr. BALL - I show you 514. Is that the way it looked when you saw it?
Mr. BOONE - Yes.
Mr. BALL - Is that the way it was when the picture was taken?
Mr. BOONE - Yes; I believe so.
Mr. BALL - This shows the rifle as you saw it, does it?
Mr. BOONE - That is right. Then you could kneel down over here and see that it had a scope, a telescopic sight on it, by looking down underneath the boxes.

What's very interesting to me is the FACT that Eugene Boone specifically stated that the rifle was about EIGHT FEET south of the partition that was the east wall of the stairs ( a partition to prevent someone from falling down into the stair well.)    And in the very next question Mr. Ball changes that distance to 3 feet.....

The photo of the rifle "In situ" is a fake....   That fake "in situ" photo shows a rifle jammed between boxes of books about three feet south of the stairway partition.

Studebaker measured the distance from from that partition as 7 feet 4 inches.... ( see Studebaker's map)

[Richard Smith]

I stopped because the debate had run it's course and frankly, I got bored with the incessant demands for answers. As for me misrepresenting things all you have to do is look at the facts without your obvious tilt to exonerate Oswald at all costs. That goes for your boyfriend JohnI. Your claims that you have no stake in Oswalds guilt or innocence would be laughable if it wasn't so pathetic.

You are wasting your time.  Like a couple of Inspector Clouseaus, they suspect everyone and suspect no one.  Of course it is much easier to be able to claim that you are not suggesting anything.  Just taking issuing with everything without ever having to connect the dots or make any sense of the direct implications of any of their nonsense having validity.  A defense attorney approach to raise false doubt for a stone cold guilty client.  Questionable in the legal context.  Lazy and dishonest in the context of discussing a case more than fifty years after the fact.

[John Iacoletti]

You are wasting your time.  Like a couple of Inspector Clouseaus, they suspect everyone and suspect no one.  Of course it is much easier to be able to claim that you are not suggesting anything.  Just taking issuing with everything without ever having to connect the dots or make any sense of the direct implications of any of their nonsense having validity.  A defense attorney approach to raise false doubt for a stone cold guilty client.  Questionable in the legal context.  Lazy and dishonest in the context of discussing a case more than fifty years after the fact.

You know what?s lazy and dishonest? Using prosecuting attorney rhetoric to claim that there is this ?mountain of evidence? for somebody?s guilt while avoiding ever enumerating or examining that evidence other than by lying about it or spinning it, or making up ridiculous strawman arguments to avoid ever having to actually support your own position.