USPS workers screwing things up i.e..LHO receiving c2766

[Rob Caprio]

It simply establishes the fact that Oswald was the only person on earth positively identititified as being on the scene during both murders.

Oh, wait... was some other shooter positively ID'd as being present at either scene during even one murder, let alone both, John?

When was LHO positively identified?

[Rob Caprio]

Where did I state in my last post anything other than Oswald was the only person on the face of the planet who was positively ID'd as being on the scene during both murders. And that no one can name anyone, other than the shooter, who  knew that there was to be an attempt made on Kennedy that day.

And that's fact.

So you are 🏃‍♂️from your earlier comment. No shock there. Now, show where LHO was "positively identified" at both murder scenes.

[Oscar Navarro]

The bus was moving.

No ...Wrong again, Mr Navarro...   Cecil Mc Watters said his bus was stopped in traffic when the man knocked on the bus door....

You, Mr. Cakebread, said that Oswald was fleeing on a stationary bus. The bus moved two blocks and then Oswald asked for a bus transfer...and then Oswald caught a taxi. Not with his bare hands, though. 

[Oscar Navarro]

And by "real evidence", Oscar means stuff he just made up like the HSCA photo panel supposedly saying that the rifle in the backyard photos was C2766 to the exclusion of any other rifle.

That was amended by me about a week ago and you know that. "Real Evidence" is what you always demand but never accept and never provide.

[Walt Cakebread]

Here is CE-515. This is the view of the area where Boone saw the rifle

Yes, That's the area alright .....  The rifle was beneath the pallet with the boxes of books stacked on it....Weitzman clearly said that he got down on the floor and shined his light beneath that stack of boxes and saw the rifle laying on the floor.

PS Notice the sunlit window that would have negated any need for a flashlight if the rifle had been beside the row of boxes as LBJ's cover up committee claimed.

[John Iacoletti]

That was amended by me about a week ago and you know that.

Right.  Amended to something that was also false.

"Real Evidence" is what you always demand but never accept and never provide.

How would you know what I would accept, given that you have yet to cite any actual evidence?

And I'm not the one making the claim that requires evidence, you are.  What is it that you want me to provide evidence of?

[Oscar Navarro]

Would you care to explain why his landlady thinking his name was "O. H. Lee" has anything to do with your claim that he used "Hidell" as an alias?

So, what Oswald said during his interrogation is "solid evidence" that he was telling the truth? That's not what Oswald told Marina. That Oswald registered at N. Beckley under O. H. Lee is "solid evidence". That Oswald ordered both C2766 and V510210 is very solid circumstantial evidence. That Oswald was identified as the man who shot Tippit (by Markham) and fled the scene eventually ending up at the Texas Theater (by several witnesses) is solid direct evidence. That the 6.5mm WC shells found on the SN were traced to C2766 to the exclusion of all other rifles is solid circumstantial evidence. The same goes for the shells found on the Tippit crime scene. That CE-399 was traced to C2766 to the exclusion of all other rifles is solid circumstantial evidence. That the two fragments of a WC 6.5mm found in the presidential limo were traced to C2766 to the exclusion of all other rifles is solid circumstantial evidence. That Oswald was arrested with V510210 on his person is solid direct evidence. What more is needed to satisfy any reasonable person that Oswald was guilty as sin of the assassination of JFK and the murder of Tippit? The key here is "rasonable person".

Do you deny that Oswald used Hidell and O. H. Lee as aliases?