JFK - A simple solution

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: JFK - A simple solution  (Read 48734 times)

Offline Eddie Haymaker

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 241
Re: JFK - A simple solution
« Reply #77 on: December 14, 2018, 10:12:30 PM »
wow - ok great Mark

we actually agree on all that

So did LHO fire upon Kennedy with malice?

Offline Alan Hardaker

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 89
Re: JFK - A simple solution
« Reply #78 on: December 14, 2018, 10:14:09 PM »
I agree with you. that is true however we all saw

JFK get shot through his right temple

making him being the lone assassin an impossibility

It was broadcast live on KLIF Dallas as clear as day

"shot through the right temple from a grassy knoll"

reported live from parkland

please listen to it on youtube

I say he was shot from behind...so how does your description of "all" come into it..

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: JFK - A simple solution
« Reply #79 on: December 14, 2018, 10:18:20 PM »
wow - ok great Mark

we actually agree on all that

So did LHO fire upon Kennedy with malice?

Nah, just with delusions of grandeur.

Offline Eddie Haymaker

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 241
Re: JFK - A simple solution
« Reply #80 on: December 14, 2018, 10:18:46 PM »
oh great, you guys seem to have the answers

perhaps you can explain how a bullet enters the third thoracic

and exits the throat.

please show me how.

or I guess you can just get nasty
« Last Edit: December 14, 2018, 10:20:41 PM by Eddie Haymaker »

Offline Alan Hardaker

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 89
Re: JFK - A simple solution
« Reply #81 on: December 14, 2018, 10:19:57 PM »
read my post regarding how LHO was employed.

things do not add up to 

"the opportunistic assassin"

but more the setup "patsy"

The proof is there as plain as day.

Except that there isn't any clear proof whatsoever other than a few uncorroborated incidents. As opposed to reams of solid evidence, eye witnesses included against Oswald.

Offline Eddie Haymaker

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 241
Re: JFK - A simple solution
« Reply #82 on: December 14, 2018, 10:24:16 PM »
Lets for arguments sake assume he did take a shot at walker.

This is where it all comes undone. On one hand they are presenting this like a totally innocent coincidence where they get him the job by chance and good intent but on the other is the walker evidence being revealed after the fact showing him to be an aspiring assassin all along.

So which one is it? You can?t have both.

Oh and BTW the route was changed too leading up to the visit.

You wanna talk about getting Dracula a job at the blood bank?

This is real evidence (circumstantial) but undeniably strong as to a wider conspiracy In Dallas and it was provided by the Warren Commission.

The public only knew on the morning of the 19th (Tuesday) the motorcade route and it was depicted as going straight down main street. At this point lets just agree there is confusion over who printed what map when and If the route was changed at all, who approved it? Lets just say If you were a lone assassin you wouldn?t know where to shoot from or when exactly.

From the Evidence you have to charge Ruth Paine with conspiracy to murder don?t you? The rifle is kept at your house? You speak Russian? She rang to enquire about the job herself.

October 16, 1963: LHO begins work at the TSBD. 5 Weeks.

Does he apply for a dozen jobs all along the motorcade route? No

Who are the ONLY people who might have foreknowledge of the route? The secret service, JFK administration and Officials of the city of Dallas.

Was the route changed? It doesn?t matter. The City of Dallas was ultimately responsible for the route. The secret service don?t plan the route in someone else?s town.

Who did LHO work for? The city of Dallas.
« Last Edit: December 14, 2018, 11:14:02 PM by Eddie Haymaker »

Offline Alan Hardaker

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 89
Re: JFK - A simple solution
« Reply #83 on: December 14, 2018, 10:31:49 PM »
The opening post is an entertaining read.

But to claim " Two massive things went wrong...Oswald wasn't killed...and...Zapruder filmed the event"

Zapruder filmed the event...now come on, are you suggesting the conspirators didn't expect or think somebody would film the event...I mean..!!..you lost a bit of credibility right there.