How Could LHO Walk Seven Blocks Shortly After The Assassination & Not Be Seen?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: How Could LHO Walk Seven Blocks Shortly After The Assassination & Not Be Seen?  (Read 191989 times)

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5119
Watch the weasel squirm?.

how much of my post after "How does this work Caprio?, you say" can be attributed to Caprio, the first few words or all of it?


All of it between the two komma's and prior to you asking a question!


Desperate for a way out, Johnny is now trying to spin this thing by suggesting that only the first part (about the FBI and WC altering testimony, which is something Rob did indeed say) was a quote from him and the second part ("therefor the entire work is contaminated") somehow wasn't.

The problem for Johnny is that the question he asked clearly reveals that by "any of this tainted evidence" he means "the entire work" that is contaminated. So, not some of it, but all of it. This is beyond obvious because if only parts of the material of the FBI and WC were "contaminated" his question would make no sense.  In other words, he needed to attribute the quote (including "the entire contamined work" bit) to Rob Caprio to be able to ask the question!

Besides, if the bit about the "entire contaminated work" is not an (alleged) quote from Rob Caprio, as Johnny now claims, then where does it come from, who said it and why is it included in a question directed at Rob Caprio?

Now let?s watch the weasel squirm some more?.

Quote
All of it between the two komma's and prior to you asking a question!

You're literally reinventing grammar to cover your ass, hilarious!

JohnM


« Last Edit: October 20, 2018, 12:02:53 PM by John Mytton »

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5119
Mytton put forth evidence and misrepresented it once again. Nothing new there.

No worries Rob, how about you stick to your bizarre theories like Ruby firing blanks and Oswald's pubic hairs and let the big boys discuss what actually happened.

JohnM

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
You're literally reinventing grammar to cover your ass, hilarious!

JohnM

Projection (Psychological)

1) An unconscious self-defence mechanism characterised by a person unconsciously attributing their own issues onto someone or something else as a form of delusion and denial.

2) A way to blame others for your own negative thoughts by repressing them and then attributing them to someone else. Due to the sorrowful nature of delusion and denial it is very difficult for the target to be able to clarify the reality of the situation.

3) A way to transfer guilt for your own thoughts, emotions and actions onto another as a way of not admitting your guilt to yourself.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Projection

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5119
Projection (Psychological)

1) An unconscious self-defence mechanism characterised by a person unconsciously attributing their own issues onto someone or something else as a form of delusion and denial.

2) A way to blame others for your own negative thoughts by repressing them and then attributing them to someone else. Due to the sorrowful nature of delusion and denial it is very difficult for the target to be able to clarify the reality of the situation.

3) A way to transfer guilt for your own thoughts, emotions and actions onto another as a way of not admitting your guilt to yourself.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Projection

The urbandictionary? You clearly have nothing left Weidmann, I never used "quotes" and when you're not heavily editing my post the context of the question I asked Caprio who by definition must know what he himself has posted, is a question that needs to be answered and btw the fact that Caprio needs you as an attack dog to help him extract himself from his self inflicted mess is beyond desperate.

JohnM

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178

The urbandictionary? You clearly have nothing left Weidmann, I never used "quotes" and when you're not heavily editing my post the context of the question I asked Caprio who by definition must know what he himself has posted, is a question that needs to be answered and btw the fact that Caprio needs you as an attack dog to help him extract himself from his self inflicted mess is beyond desperate.

JohnM

when you're not heavily editing my post

When nothing else works, just lie.... right Johnny? Show me where I ever edited your post!

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5119
when you're not heavily editing my post

When nothing else works, just lie.... right Johnny? Show me where I ever edited your post!

Without context, you can present the abridged cherry picked version just so you can deceitfully insinuate whatever you like.

you say that the FBI and the WC altered testimony therefore the entire work is contaminated


Hmmm? perhaps I missed it, but where exactly did Rob say that?

What I actually said.

How does this work Caprio?, you say that the FBI and the WC altered testimony therefore the entire work is contaminated, how can you justify using any of this tainted evidence as proof of what actually happened?

JohnM

JohnM

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Without context, you can present the abridged cherry picked version just so you can deceitfully insinuate whatever you like.

What I actually said.

JohnM

Go back to my reply (message # 59 - click below) and you will see I actually quoted the entire text and then highlighted for clarity the part I wanted to ask a question about.


you say that the FBI and the WC altered testimony therefore the entire work is contaminated

Hmmm? perhaps I missed it, but where exactly did Rob say that?

So, once again you lie and misrepresent the facts. But then, what else is new?