How Could LHO Walk Seven Blocks Shortly After The Assassination & Not Be Seen?

[John Iacoletti]

Bus transfer and Oswald's admission.  Other than that...btw still waiting for you to explain why anyone would fake Oswald getting on a bus that took him nowhere.  What was the purpose of that risky and seemingly pointless exercise again?  Your conspirators didn't have enough on their hands that day assassinating the president, getting the real assassin out of harm's way, and framing Oswald.  They also had time to arrange a false bus ride that would include locating a bus in the area at the appropriate time and somehow convincing a bus load of passengers not to say otherwise.  All for no apparent reason.   Great plan.  Very convincing.

Yet another "Richard Smith" strawman.  Rob never claimed that conspirators arranged a false bus ride.

[John Iacoletti]

The end of the story is that you can't even articulate a single reason your fantasy conspirators or WC would fake Oswald's presence on the bus.

Rob has already explained his position on this:  to divert from the testimony that Oswald got into a car with another individual.  Don't blame your lack of attention on him.

  Oswald himself admitted being on the bus.  You are calling your hero a liar.

Again with the "hero" rhetoric.  You don't know what Oswald admitted to.

  If there were any doubt, he has the bus transfer in his pocket.

Of course he did.  The police just couldn't find it for two hours.  Or those .38 bullets.

[Richard Smith]

Poor dishonest John can't keep up again.  I'm fully aware that Caprio is claiming that the bus ride was to cover up Oswald getting a ride from someone else.  The issue is why would Caprio's fantasy conspirators or even the WC fake Oswald's presence on a bus ride which does not achieve that purpose because the bus takes Oswald nowhere.  Can you comprehend that simple and obvious point?  The cab ride would achieve any objective to explain how Oswald got to his boardinghouse.  There would be no need and substantial risk to fake a ride on some random bus with a load of passengers.   What difference does it make how long the police took to find the bus transfer in his pocket?  It was in his pocket. This from the kooky contrarian who reverts to his strawman nonsense whenever someone indicates he is suggesting evidence has been faked or planted.  But here you not only suggest the transfer was planted on him but that Oswald's own admission that he was on the bus is suspect.  But you are not implying a conspiracy - right? 

[John Iacoletti]

Poor dishonest John can't keep up again.  I'm fully aware that Caprio is claiming that the bus ride was to cover up Oswald getting a ride from someone else.

Poor dishonest Richard invokes a false bus ride that Caprio never posited to answer his own question that he claims to already know the answer to.

If the bus ride goes nowhere then why are you so attached to Oswald having been on that bus?

What difference does it make how long the police took to find the bus transfer in his pocket?  It was in his pocket.

And you know this...how?

And you know that Oswald admitted to being on McWatter's bus...how, exactly?

[Rob Caprio]

The end of the story is that you can't even articulate a single reason your fantasy conspirators or WC would fake Oswald's presence on the bus.  Oswald himself admitted being on the bus.  You are calling your hero a liar.  If there were any doubt, he has the bus transfer in his pocket.

Are really dense or just dishonest? I told you that I was not involved in planning of the conspiracy so I have no idea what was planned or done, but you just ignore this.

You are taking claims that we have NO idea about in regards to them being honest or not and stating them as being facts. That is dishonest.

You cannot provide any supporting evidence for the WC's claims. NONE. For the 10th time, the bus transfer is NOT evidence of anything.

Why not answer this question? I have asked it many times and you 🏃‍♂️ from answering it everytime. Why do you choose to support a theory that has NO supporting evidence behind it?

[Rob Caprio]

Poor dishonest John can't keep up again.  I'm fully aware that Caprio is claiming that the bus ride was to cover up Oswald getting a ride from someone else.  The issue is why would Caprio's fantasy conspirators or even the WC fake Oswald's presence on a bus ride which does not achieve that purpose because the bus takes Oswald nowhere.  Can you comprehend that simple and obvious point?  The cab ride would achieve any objective to explain how Oswald got to his boardinghouse.  There would be no need and substantial risk to fake a ride on some random bus with a load of passengers.   What difference does it make how long the police took to find the bus transfer in his pocket?  It was in his pocket. This from the kooky contrarian who reverts to his strawman nonsense whenever someone indicates he is suggesting evidence has been faked or planted.  But here you not only suggest the transfer was planted on him but that Oswald's own admission that he was on the bus is suspect.  But you are not implying a conspiracy - right?

You are the furthest thing away from being fully aware as you claim that I have seen. I NEVER claimed what you are attributing to me. I simply said, "Since the the WC didn't provide supporting evidence for their claim then I will make my own claim that he received a ride out of DP." I didn't get into what you are attributing to me, but it is most likely the reason that the WC felt the need to create the two scenarios that have NO supporting evidence.

The WC's main goal was to squash any thoughts of a conspiracy.

[Richard Smith]

First of all, they're not my fantasy conspirators as you falsely state. There were conspirators because there was a conspiracy based on the evidence.

To answer your very long question simply  -- that ridiculous scenario was better than admitting that LHO received a ride since that would show that he had people working with him.

Caprio has repeatedly claimed there was a conspiracy and the purpose of faking Oswald's presence on the bus was to cover up Oswald having gotten a ride from someone else.  He apparently now realizes that makes no sense because a fake bus ride does not explain how Oswald got to his boardinghouse because the bus took him nowhere and the "fake" cab ride would have sufficed for that purpose.  Now he is running away. Dishonest John apparently knows this as well.  Here are the options:

1) Oswald was on the bus and received the transfer as the WC indicated.
2) Oswald was not on the bus and the bus transfer was planted on him by either a conspirator or the police to make it appear that he had been on the bus. 

If you reject option 1 (as Caprio clearly does), then option 2 is by implication what is being suggesting.  And that brings me to the question that I have repeated multiple times without a sensible response.  Why would a conspirator or the authorities fake Oswald's presence on a bus that takes him nowhere?  It advances no apparent purpose for the conspirators or police and entails considerable risk.  So why claim he was on the bus and plant evidence to support this claim?  Again, if the bus ride was to explain how Oswald reached his boarding house and cover up assistance from someone else, the bus ride does not do that.  It serves no purpose because it took Oswald nowhere and the cab ride would suffice for that purpose.  As a result, a faked bus ride makes no sense as part of any plan to frame Oswald or cover up a conspiracy.