How Could LHO Walk Seven Blocks Shortly After The Assassination & Not Be Seen?

[John Iacoletti]

What are you babbling about now?

[Martin Weidmann]

What are you babbling about now?

Just a desperate cry for attention!

[John Iacoletti]

Calling it lame over and over again doesn't make it so.

No, what makes it lame is that it's lame.  Frazier could have just not noticed a bag sticking up a foot and a half or so over Oswald's shoulder.  Sure.  And monkeys could have spontaneously flown out of Oswald's butt too...

Having said that, you lead the league in making lame excuses when trying to explain away the evidence against your boy.

So many shades of wrong.  What you call evidence doesn't have to be explained away.  It requires so much speculation and handwaving to even call it evidence.  And he's not my boy -- he's your fall guy.

[Steve Logan]

Wow it worked  .

[Martin Weidmann]

Any lame excuse to jam that square peg into a round hole.

Of course it is... Just because the package could have been protruding out doesn't mean it was, regardless if Frazier paid much attention to it or not.

Frazier saw Oswald put the package in his cupped hand and below his armpit before he started walking. A fact the LNs always prefer to ignore!

[John Iacoletti]

It's time again to mention the canonical list of lame LN excuses for conflicting or contradictory evidence, including their cavalcade of "lying/mistaken" witnesses:

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,100.0.html

[John Mytton]

Any lame excuse to jam that square peg into a round hole.

What round hole?

That Oswald bought the rifle eight months before the assassination and shortly thereafter took surveillance photos of General Walkers house and not long after a bullet that was perfectly consistent with Oswald's rifle was found in General Walker's house?
That Oswald was photographed with C2766?
That Oswald told a different story to Frazier and his sister about where he placed the rifle.
That Oswald told a different story to Frazier about the contents of the package?
That Oswald went home mid-week?
That Oswald left behind his Wedding ring
That Oswald left behind the vast majority of his wealth?
That a bag was found in the sniper's nest?
That the bag had Oswald's prints?
That the bag had fibers which matched the fibers in Oswald's blanket, the one that was found empty on the 22nd?
The rifle found on the 6th floor with Oswald's prints?
The rifle on the 6th floor found with fibers that matched Oswald's arrest shirt?

All the evidence leads to only one conclusion that Oswald carried his rifle into the Depository, therefore we are merely putting a square peg in the appropriate square hole and btw is your side ever going to tell us how Oswald's rifle ended up on the 6th floor, was it a magic rifle?

Without any supporting evidence to contradict any of these events how do you honestly believe that any investigation could come to an alternate conclusion to the Warren Commission?

JohnM