In 54 years has it ever been proven that CE399 is the bullet found at Parkland?

[Martin Weidmann]

Of course there will never be a real trial.  If there is no trial, then the phrase "massive problems with the chain of custody"(your phrase, not mine) is irrelevant.

It's just as irrelevant as claiming evidence would be admitted at a trial that will never be.

Now, can you show that the bullet now in evidence as CE399 was ever at Parkland Hospital?

[Steve Howsley]

... You seem to be too hung up on the idea that conspirators controlled every aspect of the case ...

So who are these conspirators you speak of? I hope you're not simply another contrarian like one or two others here who refuse to put their cards on the table.

Oh, it would be good if you would create a simple list of some aspects of the case that the conspirators did control and those they didn't control. That shouldn't be too hard?

[Martin Weidmann]

So if it wasn't planted Tomlinson found a bullet fired from Oswald's rifle.

So what's your position? Did the bullet get planted or was it fired from Oswald's rifle less than an hour earlier and the official line is correct?

I don't have a position, but (and this might confuse you) I don't think any bullet was planted at Parkland Hospital.

I just want to see any evidence that shows that the bullet now in evidence as CE399 was ever at Parkland Hospital. Do you have any?

[Steve Howsley]

I don't have a position ...

Just as I thought. So was there a conspiracy? If so who was the mastermind? What did they have control over and what didn't they have control over? You must have some inkling surely. If there wasn't a conspiracy why would there be a switch of bullets? Put something on the table.

[Martin Weidmann]

So who are these conspirators you speak of? I hope you're not simply another contrarian like one or two others here who refuse to put their cards on the table.

Oh, it would be good if you would create a simple list of some aspects of the case that the conspirators did control and those they didn't control. That shouldn't be too hard?

So who are these conspirators you speak of?

That I speak of? You were the one who brought them up;

How did the conspirators (name your favourite one here; SS, CIA, FBI, Mafia etc) know they should plant a bullet in the first place?

so why don't you tell me


Oh, it would be good if you would create a simple list of some aspects of the case that the conspirators did control and those they didn't control. That shouldn't be too hard?

There you go again, rambling on about some conspirators when all I doing is ask for evidence that proved the "Oswald did it" mantra.

[Martin Weidmann]

Just as I thought.

Is it a problem for you that I don't have a position? Are you one of those who think that whatever they believe must be true [unless proven wrong - which for most LNs is impossible to begin with] and anybody who asks for evidence to show their position is correct is somehow a contrarian.

What's the problem? You like stating your case, you just don't like proving it?

[Steve Howsley]

Is it a problem for you that I don't have a position? Are you one of those who think that whatever they believe must be true [unless proven wrong - which for most LNs is impossible to begin with] and anybody who asks for evidence to show their position is correct is somehow a contrarian.

What's the problem? You like stating your case, you just don't like proving it?

This is simply a waste of time. When you have something to contribute put it on the table.

Until then you have nothing.