JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Film footage comparison & film tampering...
Jake Maxwell:
--- Quote from: Steve Howsley on September 26, 2018, 07:15:59 AM ---Yes I know what you are saying. I'm simply asking what do you intend to do to try and get an answer to your question.
--- End quote ---
I don't have the means to do anything... Someone else might... or someone else might have already done some investigation on this. I do think such a comparison might provide some answers for us, that is all...
Steve Howsley:
--- Quote from: Jake Maxwell on September 26, 2018, 02:33:25 PM ---I don't have the means to do anything... Someone else might... or someone else might have already done some investigation on this. I do think such a comparison might provide some answers for us, that is all...
--- End quote ---
Why not contact the families and ask the question? I personally think it is a waste of time but if you feel strongly about it then spend some time establishing contacts and see if it leads to anything of interest.
Chris Bristow:
Search "1960's home movies" on Youtube and you will get a large sample of the general population.
Patrick Jackson:
--- Quote from: Jake Maxwell on September 26, 2018, 02:33:25 PM ---I don't have the means to do anything... Someone else might... or someone else might have already done some investigation on this. I do think such a comparison might provide some answers for us, that is all...
--- End quote ---
Thing is you really need seruous resorces to compare. First you need are original films. Close to imposible to have them. You cannot simply google films on the net and compare.
What I concluded over the years is that what we can find online is very bad quality films and images and that if you would have possibility to exam originals much more details would become visible such is Prayer Person.
Michael Walton:
There was and is nothing wrong with the films. Each frame of an 8mm film is the size of a pinky nail. It's going to capture about as much as is to be expected, which is not much compared to 35mm and on up.
Nix was a blue-collar worker who knew absolutely nothing about film - he simply was there that day to capture the president going by, just like he was there at his house the week before capturing his family at a party. The same with Zapruder and Muchmore. Nix - and the rest of them - wouldn't have the film background to make such a profound statement as "...the film looked different."
Keep in mind, too, that this was *film* - a very organic way of capturing motion. If the original looked one way and a copy of it looked different, it's to be expected. There was nothing sinister about it.
As I've said ad nauseum numerous times, the films were NOT tampered with. The Z film actually proves that there was a conspiracy - there is no way in hell anyone could have pulled off the sharpshooting feat that Oswald was accused of doing. The Nix film merely confirms the Zapruder film, that neither was tampered with in any way as seen in this excellent sync of the two films.
//www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWEXZyMJMtA
This comparison is repeatedly ignored over and over and over again as "big deal." It actually IS a big deal and debunks so much BS I've read about elsewhere about the films being tampered with, about frames being removed, about the Z film being shot at 18 FPS then changed mid-sequence to 48 FPS, then 67% of the frames removed. It's all ridiculous.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version