Who Was The Man Who Fired A Shot In Mrs. Lovell Penn?s Pasture?

[Rob Caprio]

I almost feel sorry for Caprio reading this thread.  Almost.

I would feel sorry for the WC since they had no supporting evidence. Why do you support a theory with no supporting evidence?

[Ray Mitcham]

I would feel sorry for the WC since they had no supporting evidence. Why do you support a theory with no supporting evidence?

Possibly for this reason, Rob..

[Walt Cakebread]

Please attempt to justify your opinion relating to the singular claims of Flora Lou Henslee Penn....aka Mrs. Lovell T Penn.
Considering your OP in this thread, you pretended to know less than you did 9 years ago.

You've been bitching about this incident for at least 9 years. It is difficult to appear even more unhinged
than Trump's SCOTUS pick as he whined, under oath, on live TV last Thursday.... a tall order, but you have accomplished
it....at least Kavanaugh's claim he was a victim of the Clintons seemed more reasonable than your whine!

Who Was The Man Who Fired A Shot In Mrs. Lovell Penn?s Pasture?

Rob ....You started this dumb thread .....   What did you hope to accomplish??   Did you think that there was ANYTHING pertinent to the case in this tale??   Or did you simply want to display your stupidity .......

[Rob Caprio]

Who Was The Man Who Fired A Shot In Mrs. Lovell Penn?s Pasture?

Rob ....You started this dumb thread .....   What did you hope to accomplish??   Did you think that there was ANYTHING pertinent to the case in this tale??   Or did you simply want to display your stupidity .......

Your total inability to think is duly noted. Only LNers would think a man who looked like LHO firing a Carcano in a pasture a month before the assassination is irrelevant.

I guess they think all the sightings setting LHO up are irrelevant to their neat and UNSUPPORTED fantasy theory. The fact that they can't answer a simple question like this without mocking me should give everyone pause because it means that their beloved WC didn't bother to check this out. Why not?

[Walt Cakebread]

Your total inability to think is duly noted. Only LNers would think a man who looked like LHO firing a Carcano in a pasture a month before the assassination is irrelevant.

I guess they think all the sightings setting LHO up are irrelevant to their neat and UNSUPPORTED fantasy theory. The fact that they can't answer a simple question like this without mocking me should give everyone pause because it means that their beloved WC didn't bother to check this out. Why not?

If it wasn't checked out.....and reported to be irrelevant, then where did the FBI report come from???

[Walt Cakebread]

Your total inability to think is duly noted. Only LNers would think a man who looked like LHO firing a Carcano in a pasture a month before the assassination is irrelevant.

I guess they think all the sightings setting LHO up are irrelevant to their neat and UNSUPPORTED fantasy theory. The fact that they can't answer a simple question like this without mocking me should give everyone pause because it means that their beloved WC didn't bother to check this out. Why not?

Only LNers would think a man who looked like LHO firing a Carcano in a pasture a month before the assassination is irrelevant.

And HOW did that shell come to be there??    You nor anybody else knows WHEN that shell was left there in the pasture?

Simply because Mrs Penn saw some young men firing a rifle in the pasture does NOT conclusively prove that it was they who left the shell there.....

Psssst Robbie.....  Are you aware that many young men "looked like" Lee?   But more important who ( other than Mrs Penn) actually knows what the man that Mrs Penn saw looked like?.... ( If the event actually happened??) 

[John Iacoletti]

Why are prisons filled with men who overlooked some detail? Show some logic.
So, we should not follow the evidence? Because we should assume the evidence is all faked. But if we do so, truth is determined by what we believe. The evidence, the real world, will have no influence on what we believe. It doesn?t matter what the fingerprint evidence is. Because if it goes against our bias, it is assumed to be faked.
And I am asked to make these assumptions. by the same people who I know lied to me. Who showed me false diagrams of the Single Bullet Theory. And who, to this day, give excuses as to why they do not disproved the Single Bullet Theory, by showing two simple orthogonal diagram, of the situation at z222, which would disproved this theory, if the theory is false.

But we're being asked to accept assumptions like "Oswald's rifle" by the same people who have lied to us.  These are two sides of the same coin.  You are assuming that a partial palmprint that showed up a week later on an index card was actually lifted by Carl Day on 11/22 -- who then forgot to mention it to anybody for several days -- just because it fits your biases.