Why Would LHO Choose His Workplace As The Location For Shooting JFK?

[Jerry Freeman]

   A waste of time. 

And yet here he is...wasting more time---trolling away

[Bill Chapman]

It’s a question of when Oswald would have read the newspaper

If it is not until Thursday, then the reason is it’s risky to take a rifle in a package into Dealey plaza on Friday morning,let alone into some other building

On the other hand, if Oswald read the Tuesday paper then he had more than enough time to explore Dealey plaza, select some spot or building, and to carry a package with rifle. If William Castor could walk around carrying TWO rifles as well as EXHIBIT them without any DPD , FBI, or other security being alarmed, then surely Oswald could have probably done so with just ONE package

---------------------------------------------------
From the Keep it Simple Sherlock Department
----------------------------------------------------

As long as Lee Harvey Occam-Oswald heard about the route of the motorcade before Frazier left work that Thursday, the little prick had a shot at becoming a somebody.

[Ross Lidell]

It’s a question of when Oswald would have read the newspaper

If it is not until Thursday, then the reason is it’s risky to take a rifle in a package into Dealey plaza on Friday morning,let alone into some other building

On the other hand, if Oswald read the Tuesday paper then he had more than enough time to explore Dealey plaza, select some spot or building, and to carry a package with rifle. If William Castor could walk around carrying TWO rifles as well as EXHIBIT them without any DPD , FBI, or other security being alarmed, then surely Oswald could have probably done so with just ONE package

It’s a question of when Oswald would have read the newspaper

Oswald did not buy newspapers. He read the discarded newspapers when they were a day old. This suggests that Oswald read about the President's motorcade route on Wednesday 20 November 1963--a day after it was first published in the Dallas newspapers.

If it is not until Thursday, then the reason is it’s risky to take a rifle in a package into Dealey plaza on Friday morning,let alone into some other building

A confusing sentence. Even so: It's not risky for Lee Oswald to take a rifle (disassembled) into the TSBD on the morning of the day that the President will pass the building in which he (Oswald) works. If law-enforcement had searched workers entering the TSBD, Oswald had an excuse for bringing his rifle to work. The disassembled state of the gun would support a story that he was taking it to a gunsmith (later in the day) to have the rifle repaired.

[Walt Cakebread]

“Common sense and reason” is what “Richard” calls it when he makes up a narrative out of thin air.

Case in point. There’s no evidence whatsoever that Oswald “scouted” the building.

Baseless speculation. There’s no reason to assume that they had any “general patterns and behaviors” to be aware of, or that Oswald was in fact aware of any.

They didn’t “generally” lay flooring. In fact, it was less likely to be deserted this particular day than usual.

Notice how “Richard” just slips in his conclusion as an assumption?

There’s no evidence that a rifle was hidden on that floor prior to the motorcade arriving.

There’s no evidence Oswald went to the sixth floor when he arrived that morning. Or that he had a rifle.

Correct. It’s just self-serving made up BS.

There’s also no way to know that the clipboard found by Frankie Kaiser 11 days later was used by Oswald on November 22. Kaiser wasn’t even at work that day.

Again, assuming the conclusion. And why are you so dead set on making up details that cannot be known?

You haven’t even proven that he brought a rifle into the building.

LOL

No witnesses saw any shooting.

Suspect to your heart’s content. Just don’t pretend you’ve proven anything.

Implicate him for what? Touching book boxes that it was his job to get books out of? Or touching a bag that you can’t demonstrate ever contained a rifle?

Guilty until proven innocent. “Reasonable” to you means the thing you already believe.

Again, these are all claims based on biased assumptions (Oops, I mean “common sense”), not evidence.

All that’s highly indicative of is that his (alleged) story contradicts Frazier. Frazier’s story over the years also contradicts Frazier’s story.

It’s laughable that you think your subjective opinions are evidence.

You act like reaching a conclusion is in-and-of-itself a virtue. Even if you have to make things up to reach it.

Just because you have no doubt doesn’t mean there is no reasonable doubt. It’s not all about you.

What you are doing is what a corrupt prosecutor does when there is a foregone conclusion. Everything points to guilt.

“I am not a witch”

“Only a true witch will deny being a witch!”

“All right then, I’m a witch”

“She’s a witch — she admitted it!”

There’s no evidence that a rifle was hidden on that floor prior to the motorcade arriving.

Actually the manner in which the rifle was found IS evidence that the Carcano was hidden BEFORE the motorcade arrived....

The two officers who spotted the rifle ( Boone and Weitzman) said that the rifle was ON THE FLOOR  beneath a pallet.... Seymour Weitzman said that he was down on the floor shining his flashlight beneath the pallet when he spotted the rifle lying on the floor

The rifle could NOT have been hidden in that manner AFTER the shooting.....Because, Baker and Truly arrived on the sixth floor about two minutes after the FIRST  shot was fired.   Baker and Truly would have seen anybody hiding the rifle....

[Ross Lidell]

There’s no evidence that a rifle was hidden on that floor prior to the motorcade arriving.

Actually the manner in which the rifle was found IS evidence that the Carcano was hidden BEFORE the motorcade arrived....

The Tw officers who spotted the rifle ( Boone and Weitzman) said that the rifle was ON THE FLOOR  beneath a pallet.... Seymour Weitzman said that he was down on the floor shining his flashlight beneath the pallet when he spotted the rifle lying on the floor

The rifle could NOT have been hidden in that manner AFTER the shooting.....Because, Baker and Truly arrived on the sixth floor about two minutes after the FIRST  shot was fired.   Baker and Truly would have seen anybody hiding the rifle....

The rifle could NOT have been hidden in that manner AFTER the shooting.....Because, Baker and Truly arrived on the sixth floor about two minutes after the FIRST  shot was fired.

Baker and Truly encountered Oswald in the second floor lunchroom approximately 90 seconds after the FIRST shot was fired at President Kennedy. Some time was consumed in the encounter. It would be impossible for them to ascend four (4) floors in thirty (30) seconds.

Baker and Truly would have seen anybody hiding the rifle....

Temporarily setting aside the timing problem: The assassin (Oswald or the 6th floor shooter) would have left the 6th floor already and not be there in the process of hiding the murder weapon. Perhaps you could explain your theory with some facts?

[Walt Cakebread]

The rifle could NOT have been hidden in that manner AFTER the shooting.....Because, Baker and Truly arrived on the sixth floor about two minutes after the FIRST  shot was fired.

Baker and Truly encountered Oswald in the second floor lunchroom approximately 90 seconds after the FIRST shot was fired at President Kennedy. Some time was consumed in the encounter. It would be impossible for them to ascend four (4) floors in thirty (30) seconds.

Baker and Truly would have seen anybody hiding the rifle....

Temporarily setting aside the timing problem: The assassin (Oswald or the 6th floor shooter) would have left the 6th floor already and not be there in the process of hiding the murder weapon. Perhaps you could explain your theory with some facts?

I never imagined that a dumbass would attempt to refute the evidence.....

Mr Lidell says that it would have been impossible           "It would be impossible for them to ascend four (4) floors in thirty (30) seconds."...  Mr Lidell apparently has a reading comprehension problem....and didn't understand the word "ABOUT" preceding  the words TWO MINUTES....  Nobody knows exactly when Baker and Truly arrived on the sixth floor but LBJ's cover up committee claimed that Baker left Lee Oswald on the second floor about 90 seconds after the shots were fired. So who knows exactly when Baker arrived on the sixth floor     I would concede that it's improbable that Baker could have arrived on the sixth floor thirty seconds after leaving Lee on the second floor....But that's not the point....  The point is:....The rifle was well hidden beneath a pallet with boxes of books stacked on it....Nobody could have hidden the rifle in the manner it was hidden after the shooting and before Baker arrived on the sixth floor.

[John Iacoletti]

Nobody could have hidden the rifle in the manner it was hidden after the shooting and before Baker arrived on the sixth floor.

Why would it necessarily have to have been put there before Baker arrived on the sixth floor?