In 54 years has anyone ever admitted to manufacturing or planting evidence?

[John Iacoletti]

Either Oswald fired CE399 or someone else did.

Yes.  That doesn't mean it had to be before or during the assassination.

An unrelated stretcher?

Yes, an unrelated stretcher.  Tomlinson said he found it on the stretcher that was already there, not the one that came off the elevator from the second floor.

From a conspiracy book. Nuff said.

From the Warren Commission Report.  Nuff said.

[John Iacoletti]

The question is how does Iacoletti or yourself determined that the stretcher was unrelated?

How do you determine that CE 399 had anything to do with the assassination?

Btw there is no doubt that the bullet found was a complete bullet but how did anybody know at that point in time the conditions of the bodies and if the bodies contained bullets or parts of bullets?

Who says anybody did?

So what you apparently believe is that your conspirators just decided to plant a bullet that precisely fits the wounds and wasn't one too many, did they have the Lotto results too?

What makes you think that the pointed bullet that Tomlinson gave O.P. Wright precisely fit anything?  Or CE 399 for that matter?

CE399 was flattened on one side indicating that it had to have struck a solid object at an angle

Well if that ain't proof that it hit Connally then I don't know what is.   

and we know by Connally's linear type back wound that it must have been caused by a tumbling bullet.

Or a bullet entering at an angle.

[John Iacoletti]

Just tell me how you think they could positively identify the bullet, did they mark it, take a photograph, memorize the microscopic striations, do a chemical analysis or what exactly?

...and yet somehow you are sure that it was the same bullet.

[John Iacoletti]

That's just personal incredulity though.

Isn't every "I don't believe conspirators would have done that" / "I don't believe Oswald would have done that" argument a personal incredulity fallacy though?

[Howard Gee]

Howard, regarding testing bullets fired into cotton, don't the testers have to know the precise distance to the target before they can adjust the 'gunpowder load' (or whatever they call it) to make up the for the much shorter muzzle to barrel-of-cotton distance?

I have no idea, Bill. Guess it would depend on varying factors, such as the amount and density of the cotton or whatever substance that's being fired into.

[John Iacoletti]

Not to mention that the conspirators would somehow have to know that Tomlinson would find a bullet and then substitute CE399 into the evidence.

How would the conspirators know that Tomlinson would find a bullet unless Tomlinson was one of the conspirators ?  And if Tomlinson was a bullet planting conspirator why the heck did he plant a bullet that wasn't identical to the ammo Saint Patsy used ?

The entire 'CE399 was planted' narrative is a bunch of delusional kookery easily dispelled through the application of common sense.

Unfortunately, common sense isn't a trait exhibited by the kooks, but at least the crap they spew is good for a laugh.

Speaking of kooks spewing crap....

Was it some kind of secret that Tomlinson found a bullet?  Why would anybody have to have known that in advance?

Keeping calling your incoherent babbling "common sense" though.  It's good for a laugh.

[Walt Cakebread]

Yes, the bullet was recovered. No, it didn't disappear into thin air. The bullet currently resides in the National Archive.

Your opinion that no shots came from the sniper's nest is contradicted by two witnesses that saw a gunman firing from there, another witness that saw a gun barrel being withdrawn from the window, 3 witnesses on the floor below the sniper's nest that testified they heard shots come from there, and 3 spent cartridges found on the floor in the sniper's nest.

Your opinion is worthless horsecrap.

Your opinion that no shots came from the sniper's nest is contradicted by two witnesses that saw a gunman firing from there

Would you please post the identities of these two witnesses.....

But, IF there were two witnesses who saw a gunman firing from the SE corner window..... Why did it take over a half hour for the police to discover the location?     If at least two witnesses saw a man firing a rifle from that SE corner window commonsense would dictate that the police would have been at that site in a matter of minutes.