In 54 years has anyone ever admitted to manufacturing or planting evidence?

[Jon Banks]

Not to mention that the conspirators would somehow have to know that Tomlinson would find a bullet and then substitute CE399 into the evidence.

How would the conspirators know that Tomlinson would find a bullet unless Tomlinson was one of the conspirators ?  And if Tomlinson was a bullet planting conspirator why the heck did he plant a bullet that wasn't identical to the ammo Saint Patsy used ?

The entire 'CE399 was planted' narrative is a bunch of delusional kookery easily dispelled through the application of common sense.

Unfortunately, common sense isn't a trait exhibited by the kooks, but at least the crap they spew is good for a laugh.

Tomlinson denied that CE 399 was the bullet he saw at Parkland and you can?t prove that CE 399 struck JFK or Connally.

[Jerry Freeman]

CE399 was flattened on one side indicating that it had to have struck a solid object at an angle and we know by Connally's linear type back wound that it must have been caused by a tumbling bullet.

The only thing that that falls flat is that argument.
 

[Martin Weidmann]

In the midst of your rambling incoherent babble, at least you got something right.

Since the conspirators would have no way to know if a bullet was recovered from Connally or JFK, then planting an additional bullet into the evidence would indeed mean that more than 3 shots were fired and cast doubt on Saint Patsy's ability to do so in the allotted time frame.

In essence, the planting of an additional bullet would hurt the lone shooter narrative, so why would the conspirators do that ?

You kooks aren't too bright.

In essence, the planting of an additional bullet would hurt the lone shooter narrative, so why would the conspirators do that ?


Perhaps they didn't! Perhaps it was just happenstance that a bullet was found at Parkland that later became very useful.

Ever thought about that?

[Gary Craig]

Connally Doc: "Magic Bullet" didn't cause wounds

"Dr. Robert Shaw, Governor Connally's physician, says that CE 399, the "Magic Bullet", could not have caused the wounds he saw and treated in Governor Connally."

[Allan Fritzke]

In the midst of your rambling incoherent babble, at least you got something right.

Since the conspirators would have no way to know if a bullet was recovered from Connally or JFK, then planting an additional bullet into the evidence would indeed mean that more than 3 shots were fired and cast doubt on Saint Patsy's ability to do so in the allotted time frame.

In essence, the planting of an additional bullet would hurt the lone shooter narrative, so why would the conspirators do that ?

You kooks aren't too bright.

I am afraid you aren't too bright!   Where is the bullet that entered Connally's leg?  Did it disappear into thin air?  Was it recovered?  Why not?  Was it hardpoint or softpoint?  Softpoint would have ripped him apart and mushroomed when it hit a rib.    The PBS Nova documentary (1988?)  claimed the rib was pulverized.    They suggested that the bullet found on the stretcher was this magic bullet.   We know only know of 2 bullets found.  The one that hit Kennedy's head  and the stretcher bullet, both were entered as evidence.    They didn't even bother to dig out the one from the pavement - it dissipated into thin air  (powder) and became street sweeper material - not a trace recoverd lol!
The so-called first bullet disappeared as did the one you would expect to have found lodged in Connally's leg to similar match the found one in Kennedy.  There was none recovered, not even a fragment.  It should have looked similar to Kennedy's if it was the same type fired by the same gun.   Naturally it would have had different deformation as it didn't strike a skull first!"
Consider an expert lone sniper wouldn't be switching different types of bullet tips and casings would he?  You like Remington or Winchester, you use one or the other that you think is best - not both"!   He bought different boxes and used the remnants from the shooting range in a random manner!   Mixing casings?  Laughable evidence!   Conspiracy?  Most definitely the evidence points in that direction!  No shots came from the sniper's nest in my opinion. 

[Howard Gee]

Where is the bullet that entered Connally's leg?  Did it disappear into thin air?  Was it recovered?

 No shots came from the sniper's nest in my opinion.

Yes, the bullet was recovered. No, it didn't disappear into thin air. The bullet currently resides in the National Archive.

Your opinion that no shots came from the sniper's nest is contradicted by two witnesses that saw a gunman firing from there, another witness that saw a gun barrel being withdrawn from the window, 3 witnesses on the floor below the sniper's nest that testified they heard shots come from there, and 3 spent cartridges found on the floor in the sniper's nest.

Your opinion is worthless horsecrap.

[Bill Chapman]

Alright, I'll ignore your avoidance of stating whether you believe the examples cited are 'probable' evidence of tampering.

Let's start with the 'probable' planting of the magic bullet.

How on earth would the conspirators know whether any bullets were found in JFK or Connally at the time the 'magic bullet' would have had to be planted ?

They couldn't.

If a bullet was found in JFK and/or Connally that would mean that Saint Patsy would have had to get off even more than the 3 shots that the CT's already doubt he could have done. More shots = less chance Saint Patsy was a lone assassin. So why would they plant an additional bullet ?

Additionally, think about what the planting would entail.

Did the conspirators fire CE399 into some cotton wadding or water before the assassination and have it laying around somewhere so that Ruby or whoever could plant it ?

Did they have a bullet planting team waiting in Parkland ?

And if you're going to claim they substituted CE399 for the bullet Tomlinson found, you have to explain how they knew Tomlinson was going to find a bullet, or was he part of the conspiracy too ?

So I ask you, is the magic bullet planting scenario 'probable', or is it delusional kookery ?

What do you think, Jon ?

Howard, regarding testing bullets fired into cotton, don't the testers have to know the precise distance to the target before they can adjust the 'gunpowder load' (or whatever they call it) to make up the for the much shorter muzzle to barrel-of-cotton distance?