JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
In 54 years has anyone ever admitted to manufacturing or planting evidence?
John Mytton:
--- Quote from: Royell Storing on September 15, 2018, 05:00:40 AM --- I notice you have conveniently Omitted the Autopsy Face Sheet depiction of the location of the Back Wound, in addition to autopsy photos of the same back wound. These would be "actual medical evidence". Typical. Plus, the description you have underlined above describes the Damage inflicted by the bullet. NOT the Entry Point of the bullet.
--- End quote ---
Sorry Royell, but all your squirming won't change the fact that all Ford did was change the wording to accurately reflect what was written in the Autopsy Report. Try again.
JohnM
Colin Crow:
--- Quote from: Bill Chapman on September 15, 2018, 05:15:30 AM ---Tha OP asks for manufactured or planted evidence
Nor destroyed evidence
--- End quote ---
Thanks for the heads up Bill. My post removed accordingly. Oppps better inform the others who failed to comply too. Keep up the good work.
Bill Chapman:
--- Quote from: John Mytton on September 15, 2018, 05:16:06 AM ---Sorry Royell, but all your squirming won't change the fact that all Ford did was change the wording to accurately reflect what was written in the Autopsy Report. Try again.
JohnM
--- End quote ---
Why are people talking about destroyed evidence
Your OP clearly asks for manufactured or planted evidence
Martin Weidmann:
--- Quote from: John Mytton on September 15, 2018, 05:11:31 AM ---Thanks Mark.
The Limo was thoroughly inspected and photographed beforehand and after travelling 60 miles per hour and all the maneuvering to remove the wounded would likely imo make any blood spatter analysis difficult.
The only way we found out about the burning was through Humes himself so where can this possibly go from here?
This was more about covering the FBI's ass rather than having any affect on case against Oswald.
Yeah, it makes you wonder why the conspirators would commit the assassination in Dallas and then be forced to move the body back to where they were more in control when the simple alternative of performing the murder on the other side of the country with no problems would have to be a no brainer.
Well they can't Xray under the boxes, so the boxes had to be moved at some point.
You bring up some interesting discrepancies but as I have pointed out nothing above would have any significant impact on the prosecution's case.
JohnM
--- End quote ---
This was more about covering the FBI's ass rather than having any affect on case against Oswald.
And you know this with any kind of certainty, how?
Well they can't Xray under the boxes, so the boxes had to be moved at some point.
They X-rayed the boxes in the sniper's nest? Really?
Bill Chapman:
--- Quote from: Colin Crow on September 15, 2018, 05:21:54 AM ---Thanks for the heads up Bill. My post removed accordingly. Oppps better inform the others who failed to comply too. Keep up the good work.
--- End quote ---
Or have John add 'destroyed' to his OP
Might widen the net, possibly resulting in a 'deadlier catch'
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version