Conspiracy of the Three Stooges

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Conspiracy of the Three Stooges  (Read 186075 times)

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: Conspiracy of the Three Stooges
« Reply #14 on: September 14, 2018, 10:01:32 AM »
You can remove me from your imaginary 'threatened LNer' list.

My conclusion is that this assassination was a last minute, random event probably carried out by an oppotunistic mentally-deranged X-marine who got somewhat lucky on the head shot. No reason why Lee Harvey Occam-Oswald would need help given the simple nature of poking a rifle out a window and landing a couple of rounds on Kennedy.

You're giving a lot of credit to 3 men you call 'stooges' to even have the 'chops' to be involved in? seemingly?some sort of overly-complicated Machiavellian scheme.

So you do not believe the men lied in face of the documented evidence that they did. Duly noted and nothing of substance to contributed to the original question posed in the thread from you.....as expected.

Offline Nicholas Turner

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 378
Re: Conspiracy of the Three Stooges
« Reply #15 on: September 14, 2018, 10:06:58 AM »
So you do not believe the men lied in face of the documented evidence that they did. Duly noted and nothing of substance to contributed to the original question posed in the thread from you.....as expected.

A lie means an intentional untruth though - is it clear that this was the case or were they confuse or unsure. Was their memory faulty?

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: Conspiracy of the Three Stooges
« Reply #16 on: September 14, 2018, 10:14:32 AM »
A lie means an intentional untruth though - is it clear that this was the case or were they confuse or unsure. Was their memory faulty?

So you are going with the theory that they both had the same faulty memory? That Williams went with them to the 5th floor in the elevator. Then some miracle of memory for both allows them to recall the "truth" about 5 months later. Really? Ever been on jury duty.....or a parent? Surely you guys can see BS when it?s in your face. I mean it?s the President who has been shot and you don?t remember how you met up with the guy who just happened to be where he was shot from minutes before.

Offline Nicholas Turner

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 378
Re: Conspiracy of the Three Stooges
« Reply #17 on: September 14, 2018, 10:37:38 AM »
So you are going with the theory that they both had the same faulty memory? That Williams went with them to the 5th floor in the elevator. Then some miracle of memory for both allows them to recall the "truth" about 5 months later. Really? Ever been on jury duty.....or a parent? Surely you guys can see BS when it?s in your face. I mean it?s the President who has been shot and you don?t remember how you met up with the guy who just happened to be where he was shot from minutes before.

No, I am questioning the use of the term lie.

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: Conspiracy of the Three Stooges
« Reply #18 on: September 14, 2018, 11:38:01 AM »
No, I am questioning the use of the term lie.

It is an intentional falsehood.....in this instance all three participated in the first few days of the investigation. We also have to include Williams reluctance to include the lunch details and time of arrival and departure in these deceptions.

Put yourself in their position and answer honestly. You are being asked about events minutes before the president's assassination. If you are unsure or confused would you say so or go with a story that is proven false months later. Your original story will match your friend's. You will both eventually have to recant. What statement do you make at the time?

Are they all confused and mistaken the same way?

Offline Howard Gee

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Re: Conspiracy of the Three Stooges
« Reply #19 on: September 14, 2018, 12:48:27 PM »
It is an intentional falsehood.....in this instance all three participated in the first few days of the investigation. We also have to include Williams reluctance to include the lunch details and time of arrival and departure in these deceptions.

Put yourself in their position and answer honestly. You are being asked about events minutes before the president's assassination. If you are unsure or confused would you say so or go with a story that is proven false months later. Your original story will match your friend's. You will both eventually have to recant. What statement do you make at the time?



Are they all confused and mistaken the same way?

According to your timeline the 3 stooges would have had to conspire to lie sometime before 1:30 PM on 11/22/63.

If Larry and Curly hadn't conspired with Moe to lie by that time, then Larry and Curly both wouldn't have said that Moe came up to the 5th floor with them.

So there's the answer to your question.

Now that the time of the Stooge conspiracy has been established is there a point you want to make ?

I'm pretty sure you don't think Moe was shooting at JFK, so I'm guessing you think Moe saw something on the 6th floor but the Stooges agreed to a conspiracy of silence to protect Moe ?

Sure would help if you quit beating around the bush and just spit out whatever theory you have.

Tell the forum what you think the stooges conspired to lie about, and more importantly why they conspired.

Took about three hours of back and forth the last time we had a detailed discussion regarding what you thought was in the 3 foot bag Saint Patsy had on 11/22/63 (rubber chicken, right ?).

Let's see if we can save some time and have you just state your theory this time.

Might actually be a good one.

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: Conspiracy of the Three Stooges
« Reply #20 on: September 14, 2018, 02:24:34 PM »
You seem to be under some impression that my posts are intended to convince you or Bill or JohnM to change your view of events. Or that I even seek something from you that I have not heard of or thought of myself previously. That notion was abandoned long ago. I understand that the WC supporters that post here have an unshiftable belief. One that cannot accept variance from a specific script.  I still hold hope that someone interested in reasoned discussion/debate will offer some information that advances my understanding of the events that day. Perhaps the real motivation for my posts is for the 70 or so guest viewers of this thread at this time and that they too will be encouraged to question the official story.

They might find that much of the official version of events is not supported by the assembled evidence that was gathered.