Of course, for you it is not going to work. There is nothing that would work with you.
LNer 101. Blame the other person instead of admit that the evidence doesn't support the WC's claims.
By the way, why do speak so authoritatively about me when you supposedly just arrived at this board?
For instance, the best forensic pathology experts in the world all agreed that
Kennedy was shot from behind.
That is not true since two of the three prosectors weren't even forensic pathologists. Outside of the doctors at PH and the prosectors no forensic pathologists viewed JFK's body. Name your doctors.
That means nothing to you.
Things that aren't true usually don't.
The best experts authenticated the autopsy x-rays and photogrpahs. That probably means nothing to you.
Name them.
We now have excellent trajectory diagrams that show Kennedy and Connally were aligned for a shot from the TSBD. That probably means nothing to you. It is not I who is impervious to
the evidence. It is you.
Baloney. Even the WC's own evidence shows that the SBT was fictional. You are unable to cite *supporting* evidence. It is not I who has the issue, but rather you. You simply have NO supporting evidence. You, like all LNers, use unsupported claims instead.
