Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room  (Read 34200 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
« Reply #14 on: September 13, 2018, 10:18:25 PM »
No, it's called satire.

Didn't realize Duncan appointed you as moderator.

Who's moderating?

Quote
And of course interjecting yourself into this thread to call me a pre-adolescent posturing troll is productive conversation and discussion of the actual evidence.

That's because you injected yourself into the thread with pre-adolescent posturing trolling...er I mean "satire".  But valid point,  you're better off just ignored.


Offline Howard Gee

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
« Reply #15 on: September 13, 2018, 10:25:31 PM »
Who's moderating?

That's because you injected yourself into the thread with pre-adolescent posturing trolling...er I mean "satire".  But valid point,  you're better off just ignored.



Then just ignore me and get off my nuts.

Why is that so difficult ?

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
« Reply #16 on: September 13, 2018, 10:38:56 PM »
It's called satire, Johnboi.

Get a life.

Howard, I know satire, I?ve worked with satirists, I?ve studied satire. Howard, you?re no satirist.

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
« Reply #17 on: September 13, 2018, 10:51:31 PM »
What's that got to do with the OP?

Hijacker, GTF off my thread

As much as Howard's attempts at humour and your suggestion that the shooting of Oswald by Ruby relates to the gorilla experiment.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
« Reply #18 on: September 14, 2018, 08:21:52 AM »
your suggestion that the shooting of Oswald by Ruby relates to the gorilla experiment.

Exactly. Going by the tasks given to IG testers, Oswald was the 'basketball' in the room. The 'invisible* Ruby' competes the relationship here.

*during his approach
« Last Edit: September 14, 2018, 08:27:08 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
« Reply #19 on: September 14, 2018, 08:35:53 AM »
Exactly. Going by the tasks given to IG testers, Oswald was the 'basketball' in the room. The 'invisible* Ruby' competes the relationship here.

*during his approach

Selective quote with the effect to reverse the true intent......intellectual dishonesty duly noted.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Jack Ruby: The Gorilla in the Room
« Reply #20 on: September 14, 2018, 08:47:28 AM »
Williams, Jarman and Norman conspired and decided to lie immediately after the assassination.

They did so because they felt guilty about causing the assassination.

How did they cause the assassination, you ask ?

Here's how...

Williams, Jarman and Norman accidently discovered the 3+ foot cheese sandwich that Saint Patsy had smuggled into the depository. Without any consideration for Saint Oz, each of them ate a foot of the sandwich and left nothing but a few crumbs for Oz.

Naturally, Oz was livid when he discovered his gigantic cheese sandwich had been stolen and devoured.

Oz was so ticked off that he decided to shoot all 3 of the cheese sandwich thieves.

But at the last minute he changed his mind and decided to shoot JFK instead.

The whole BRW story about eating a bone-in chicken sandwich is an obvious fabrication designed to cover up the fact that he was part of the cheese sandwich theft which ultimately resulted in JFK getting his melon blown off.

If they had only known how attached Oz was to his cheese sandwich and how grumpy he got when he was hungry, the entire assassination could have been avoided.

That's why they conspired and lied.

Wait a minute. I'm certain that Ozzie ate the top off the 36" sandwich in order to fit it into a 34. 8" size, so as to disguise it in case people might mistake it for a rifle.