Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket

[Bill Brown]

Speaking of an inability to understand what is written.

Mr. BELIN. I am going to now hand you what has been marked as 738 and ask you to state if you know what this is.
Mr. DAY. Yes, sir. This is a photograph of most of the evidence that was returned to the FBI the second time on November 26, 1963. It was released to Agent Vince Drain at 2 p.m., November 26.

Where does Day even say when the picture was taken?

It is my belief that the items were photographed because they were being turned over to the FBI on the 26th.  Hell, the photo could have been taken the day before being turned over to the FBI.  That would still have Stombaugh analyzing the bag and blanket BEFORE the photo was taken.

Stombaugh analyzed those two items on the 23rd.  Assuming that you believe Stombaugh.  Do you?  Or is he wrong or lying, too?

[Bill Brown]

You claimed that Day is correct.  I'm not claiming that Tague was correct.  That's the difference.

But, you did indeed chide Tim Nickerson when you asked him this question below...

"What makes you more authoritative on this than the guy who was actually hit?"

So, Tague could be wrong about when he was hit.  Right?

[John Iacoletti]

It is my belief that the items were photographed because they were being turned over to the FBI on the 26th.  Hell, the photo could have been taken the day before being turned over to the FBI.  That would still have Stombaugh analyzing the bag and blanket BEFORE the photo was taken.

So, all of your grandstanding about when the photo was taken was all a bluff.

Stombaugh analyzed those two items on the 23rd.  Assuming that you believe Stombaugh.  Do you?  Or is he wrong or lying, too?

I have no reason not to.  Unfortunately, all Stombaugh's analysis shows is that the fibers he found could have originated from the blanket.

[John Iacoletti]

But, you did indeed chide Tim Nickerson when you asked him this question below...

"What makes you more authoritative on this than the guy who was actually hit?"

So, Tague could be wrong about when he was hit.  Right?

Yes, Tague could be wrong.  I still want to know what makes Tim's opinion more authoritative.

[Walt Cakebread]

It is my belief that the items were photographed because they were being turned over to the FBI on the 26th.  Hell, the photo could have been taken the day before being turned over to the FBI.  That would still have Stombaugh analyzing the bag and blanket BEFORE the photo was taken.

Stombaugh analyzed those two items on the 23rd.  Assuming that you believe Stombaugh.  Do you?  Or is he wrong or lying, too?

It is my belief that the items were photographed because they were being turned over to the FBI on the 26th.

Have you read Hosty's  book  Assignment Oswald   Hosty said they inventoried and photographed the evidence on the night of 11/22/63 before it left the possession of the Dallas Police.....

[Tim Nickerson]

It is my belief that the items were photographed because they were being turned over to the FBI on the 26th.

Have you read Hosty's  book  Assignment Oswald   Hosty said they inventoried and photographed the evidence on the night of 11/22/63 before it left the possession of the Dallas Police.....

Some of the evidence was photographed on 11/22/63 but not all. The photograph in question here was not taken on the night of 11/22/63.

[Bill Brown]

It is my belief that the items were photographed because they were being turned over to the FBI on the 26th.

Have you read Hosty's  book  Assignment Oswald   Hosty said they inventoried and photographed the evidence on the night of 11/22/63 before it left the possession of the Dallas Police.....

Irrelevant.

The items were turned over to the FBI for the 2nd time on the 26th.

Evidence was turned over to the FBI on the night of the assassination.  The evidence was then returned to Dallas.  Then, evidence was again sent to Washington on the 26th.