Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket  (Read 460417 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #364 on: February 07, 2018, 11:41:43 PM »
Is this somehow supposed to be your proof that Secret Service agents were at the library?

But if Earlene Roberts said Oswald was wearing a jacket and Johnny Brewer said he wasn't, then you can take those statements to the bank.

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2007
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #365 on: February 07, 2018, 11:46:37 PM »
But if Earlene Roberts said Oswald was wearing a jacket and Johnny Brewer said he wasn't, then you can take those statements to the bank.

Apples and oranges.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #366 on: February 07, 2018, 11:47:14 PM »
I have no idea what was going through Lee's mind.

Having the cab go past the rooming house before getting out made a ton of sense.

Not really.  Lee didn't tell his employer where he lived.  He was living on Beckley under an assumed name.  Not even his wife knew where he was living.  Even if he thought they could have suspected him as early as 12:34 PM, why would he think they would know about the Beckley room 20 minutes later?

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2007
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #367 on: February 08, 2018, 12:19:22 AM »
Not really.  Lee didn't tell his employer where he lived.  He was living on Beckley under an assumed name.  Not even his wife knew where he was living.  Even if he thought they could have suspected him as early as 12:34 PM, why would he think they would know about the Beckley room 20 minutes later?

You'd have to ask Lee that.

Still, no harm in having the cab go past the rooming house before getting out.

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #368 on: February 08, 2018, 12:31:23 AM »
I happen to agree with your interpretation, but the statement is ambiguous and could be interpreted either way.

"They knew what they were doing and they were trying to railroad him". ...William Whaley at a police line up on 11/23/63

These are the words of a simple cabbie.....  Whaley observed  the unfairness of the line up and recognized that Lee was being "railroaded"......when he said...."they were trying to railroad him"

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #369 on: February 08, 2018, 02:57:22 AM »
You'd have to ask Lee that.

Still, no harm in having the cab go past the rooming house before getting out.

Maybe Whaley's passenger got out at the 500 block of North Beckley because that's where he was going.  Or even south of there as Whaley mentioned he was angled south when he got out of the cab.

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2007
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #370 on: February 08, 2018, 03:19:58 AM »
Maybe Whaley's passenger got out at the 500 block of North Beckley because that's where he was going.  Or even south of there as Whaley mentioned he was angled south when he got out of the cab.

Whaley's passenger did not get out at the 500 block.  The passenger gave the 500 block of North Beckley as the destination when he entered the cab, but once the cab passed the rooming house, the passenger told Whaley to stop and he exited the cab a couple blocks short of the original destination (and about three blocks past the rooming house).