JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket
Gary Craig:
--- Quote from: John Mytton on January 18, 2018, 11:03:19 PM ---
So she didn't understand 1 clearly ambiguous question, WOW, is that all you got?
And as for the identification it wasn't the exact same Oswald, this future Oswald was bruised, cut and had a huge welt over his left eye, so a little trepidation is not only accepted but is welcome with open arms because her slight hesitation can only further reinforce her positive identification.
Try again!
JohnM
--- End quote ---
"So she didn't understand 1 clearly ambiguous question"
::)
You might want to look up "ambiguous" in a non LNer Dictionary.
Q: Did you recognize anyone in the lineup?
Markham: No, sir
John Mytton:
--- Quote from: Gary Craig on January 18, 2018, 11:21:45 PM ---"So she didn't understand 1 clearly ambiguous question"
::)
You might want to look up "ambiguous" in a non LNer Dictionary.
Q: Did you recognize anyone in the lineup?
Markham: No, sir
--- End quote ---
Exactly, you do realize that Iacoletti argued for weeks, at which point someone was known and unknown and by whom, and you expect Markham to act how you want and if not you throw her under a bus for what is perfectly explainable, you Oswald fanatics are beyond reason.
JohnM
Gary Craig:
--- Quote from: John Mytton on January 18, 2018, 11:27:00 PM ---
Exactly, you do realize that Iacoletti argued for weeks, at which point someone was known and unknown and by whom, and you expect Markham to act how you want and if not you throw her under a bus for what is perfectly explainable, you Oswald fanatics are beyond reason.
JohnM
--- End quote ---
Could you translate your response into adult english.
I don't understand gibberish.
John Mytton:
--- Quote from: Gary Craig on January 18, 2018, 11:31:47 PM ---Could you translate your response into adult english.
I don't understand gibberish.
--- End quote ---
Up until now you've shown a clear lack of comprehending anything that convicts Oswald, so further clarifying a fact that you have no desire in accepting would be futile.
JohnM
Gary Craig:
--- Quote from: John Mytton on January 18, 2018, 11:37:13 PM ---
Up until now you've shown a clear lack of comprehending anything that convicts Oswald, so further clarifying a fact that you have no desire in accepting would be futile.
JohnM
--- End quote ---
Here's where you knuckle heads don't get it.
Oswald wasn't convicted of anything. He never went to trial. He never even got to talk to a lawyer before
being lynched.
The WCR is the uncontested prosecution case against him.
Comprehending it isn't a problem.
It's veracity is though.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version