Roger Craig

[John Mytton]

I don't intent(sic) to solve the case so once again you've failed royally!

What has your intent to solve this case possibly have to do with my success or failure?

JohnM

[Dan O'meara]

Lack of something can not make me "so hopeless at solving this case" unless I intend to solve the case.

That's how you failed again.

Get it now?

 

I've just noticed the "tell" proving Weidmann is, indeed, Beck.

It's been bugging me for a while that Weidmann doesn't realise it's "cannot" and not "can not".
It's hardly a coincidence that Otto displays the same basic illiteracy.

#busted

[Vincent Baxter]

Only a total loser would be wasting time trolling random forum members to check if their posts disappear.

Whereas creating multiple accounts and aliases on the forum to gang up on people and give the illusion that more members support your argument is the behaviour of a sure fire winner? 

[Martin Weidmann]

Whereas creating multiple accounts and aliases on the forum to gang up on people and give the illusion that more members support your argument is the behaviour of a sure fire winner? 

Take it easy, John. Don't overdo it...

[Martin Weidmann]

I've just noticed the "tell" proving Weidmann is, indeed, Beck.

It's been bugging me for a while that Weidmann doesn't realise it's "cannot" and not "can not".
It's hardly a coincidence that Otto displays the same basic illiteracy.

#busted

Hilarious ignorance

https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/cannot-vs-can-not-is-there-a-difference

Do you realize now you've just made a fool of yourself on multiple levels?

[Vincent Baxter]

Hilarious ignorance

Do you realize now you've just made a fool of yourself on multiple levels?

As opposed to making a fool of yourself on multiple forum accounts 

[Martin Weidmann]

As opposed to making a fool of yourself on multiple forum accounts 

You're overdoing it, Johnny...