Roger Craig

[Gary Craig]

Is there something wrong with your eyes?   Can't you LOOK at Tom Alyeas film and SEE that the rifle that Lt. Day picks up FROM THE FLOOR  ( not jammed between boxes) is a model 91/38 Mannlicher Carcano?

Even Alyea said a good amount of the film he took that day was discarded. If in fact they would have let him film the Mauser.

Your proposition is based on a partial film record and the words of people you yourself have said aren't always honest.

[Walt Cakebread]

I'm "unbelievable" STUPID, am I? High praise coming from Walt "The Fabricator" Cakehole.

PS. I always know where your trigger point is. It's when you got nothin but ad homs left. Unbelievably STUPID.

 I always know where your trigger point is. It's when you got nothin but ad homs left.

Wrong! Stupid..... My patience runs out when I've repeatedly told you that there are at least a half dozen witnesses ( Weitzman, Boone, Craig, Wiseman, Alyea, Day et al )  who swore that nobody touched the rifle prior to Lt Day picking it up FROM THE FLOOR . and Alyea filmed Day as he picked the rifle up off THE FLOOR.  and yet you being the STUPID person that you are,  insist that the rifle that Weitzman and Boone discovered  was a mauser but it was switched and the carcano put in place of the mauser.     

[Walt Cakebread]

Even Alyea said a good amount of the film he took that day was discarded. If in fact they would have let him film the Mauser.

Your proposition is based on a partial film record and the words of people you yourself have said aren't always honest.

a partial film record

I agree that Alyea's film ( what remains of it) is difficult to see..... It has been chopped up to destroy the photographic record of the truth.  But it's still possible to see Lt Day pick the carcano UP OFF THE FLOOR   as opposed to the official DPD in situ photo that shows the rifle jammed between boxes of books.   Alyea's film along with the statement of the witnesses make it clear that the rifle was lying on the floor with the barrel pointing east the scope was to the north and the trigger guard was facing south.  When Boone discovered it the rifle was at the bottom of a chasm of boxes of books and the chasm was covered at the top by boxes of books.    IOW  The rifle was well hidden and it was NOT hastily cast aside as the conspirators have claimed.   One witness said that he was six feet tall and he couldn't have placed the rifle on the floor at the bottom of the chasm unless he moved some of the boxes and got down in the chasm.

I've emphasized the fact that the rifle was ON THE FLOOR to illuastrate that the DPD faked the insitu photo to frame Lee Oswald...by making it appear that he had dashed by the site and jammed the rifle between boxes of books.   The official in situ photo is a damned lie.

and the words of people you yourself have said aren't always honest.

Yes, and this is why I have no respect for Roger Craig.....   He had valuable information.....but he destroyed his credibility by lying and embroidering.     

[Jack Trojan]

Unless you can come up with a good reason why Weitzman was shown a 7.65 Mauser, then you can't assume he and Craig didn't see it in the TSBD.

"I" need to establish a reason that  Weitzman allegedly described a 7.65 mauser for FBI agent Sayers?    I'm sure that Weitzman and Boone did not see a mauser in the TSBD.....I don't "ASSUME" that Weitzman and Craig DID NOT see a 7.65 mauser in the TSBD.  Based on Weitzman's and Craigs statements they left the TSBD immediately after the Carcano was picked up FROM THE FLOOR and they did not return to the TSBD.   So I'm sure that they did NOT see a 7.65 mauser in the TSBD that afternoon....   However Weitzman was summoned to the police station later that Friday afternoon and was interviewed by FBI agent Seyers who typed up a report on that interview afterward.  That's when the mauser surfaces....But we don't know that Weitzman actually described the mauser or if Sayers just described it himself ...... As far as I know Weitzman never saw Sayers report.....and he did not initial it......

Mr. Cakehole, you are unbelievably STUPID! Good luck with that.

[Walt Cakebread]

Mr. Cakehole, you are unbelievably STUPID! Good luck with that.

Is this your best?      Can't you do a little better?   Why can't you accept that Roger Craig never saw a mauser in the TSBD that day?

[Gary Craig]

(Roger ) Craig saw a second Oswald come from the rear of the Depository...

Roger Craig saw other things that were mere figments of his imagination....Like " I was no more than six or eight inches away from the rifle and I saw stamped right there on the barrel 7.65 mauser"     Roger never explained why 7.65 mauser would be stamped on a 6.5mm Mannlicher Carcano, but he acknowledged that the spent shells that were discovered beneath the window were 6.5mm carcano.....

Take Roger Craig out of the equation. He's a distraction and not necessary to prove/disprove the existence of the Mauser on the 6th floor on 11/22/63.

Explain away the documentation that Weitzman and Boone created with their affidavits, investigative reports and FBI interview.

"They were mistaken" isn't a valid explanation. IMO They wouldn't have guessed about the make. model and caliber of the murder weapon involving the POTUS.

[Walt Cakebread]

Take Roger Craig out of the equation. He's a distraction and not necessary to prove/disprove the existence of the Mauser on the 6th floor on 11/22/63.

Explain away the documentation that Weitzman and Boone created with their affidavits, investigative reports and FBI interview.

"They were mistaken" isn't a valid explanation. IMO They wouldn't have guessed about the make. model and caliber of the murder weapon involving the POTUS.

They were mistaken" isn't a valid explanation. IMO

Well how do you explain the film which shows Lt Day reaching out and grabbing the leather sling of the rifle that is LYING ON THE FLOOR and pick it up where it is clearly seen and can be identified as a model 91 / 38 Mannlicher Carcano.