Roger Craig

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Roger Craig  (Read 316338 times)

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Roger Craig
« Reply #210 on: April 18, 2020, 04:32:18 PM »

                                                                                           :-\

Some DPD photos show only TWO spent shells..... But the DPD mixed the authentic photos in with the fake photos so I'm sure there will be those who point out that other photos show three spent shells.

Online Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
Re: Roger Craig
« Reply #211 on: April 18, 2020, 07:25:33 PM »
With people like you posting nonsense.... We never will get to the bottom of it....

As if you are going to get to the bottom of it. There is a very good chance that some token shots were taken from the 6th floor so witnesses could direct the cops to where they thought the shots came from. This was crucial so the DPD could converge on Oswald in record time. So that being the case, then an Oswald surrogate took a few shots with a Mauser, ditched it then escaped the scene. You acknowledge that Oswald didn't take any shots himself, so someone else must have. The conspirators would have used a surrogate who looked somewhat like Oswald. What is so nonsensical about that scenario? I think your claim that no shots came from the 6th floor is equally ludicrous because the conspirators needed to draw attention to the 6th floor so Fritz could do his magic. Otherwise, why else did the DPD go there, find the rifle(s) and converge on Oswald in the theater an hour after he supposedly took the shots? Do you think that Fritz was a genius and the DPD were crackerjack cops? Get real.

You need to extract your head and open your lyin' eyes to how the Big Event must have went down rather than focus exclusively on the so-called "evidence" that you glean from the internet, fed to you by the conspirators, which you consider gospel.
« Last Edit: April 18, 2020, 07:29:15 PM by Jack Trojan »

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Roger Craig
« Reply #212 on: April 18, 2020, 07:36:12 PM »
As if you are going to get to the bottom of it. There is a very good chance that some token shots were taken from the 6th floor so witnesses could direct the cops to where they thought the shots came from. This was crucial so the DPD could converge on Oswald in record time. So that being the case, then an Oswald surrogate took a few shots with a Mauser, ditched it then escaped the scene. You acknowledge that Oswald didn't take any shots himself, so someone else must have. The conspirators would have used a surrogate who looked somewhat like Oswald. What is so nonsensical about that scenario? I think your claim that no shots came from the 6th floor is equally ludicrous because the conspirators needed to draw attention to the 6th floor so Fritz could do his magic. Otherwise, why else did the DPD go there, find the rifle(s) and converge on Oswald in the theater an hour after he supposedly took the shots? Do you think that Fritz was a genius and the DPD were crackerjack cops? Get real.

You need to extract your head and open your lyin' eyes to how the Big Event must have went down rather than focus exclusively on the so-called "evidence" that you glean from the internet, fed to you by the conspirators, which you consider gospel.



You're fool Mr Trojan.

Online Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
Re: Roger Craig
« Reply #213 on: April 18, 2020, 07:58:11 PM »
You're fool Mr Trojan.

And you're an idiot. Checkmate, fool!  :-*

ps. Let he who claims "nonsense" cast the 1st stone. Extract your head and try again.
« Last Edit: April 18, 2020, 08:09:33 PM by Jack Trojan »

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Roger Craig
« Reply #214 on: April 18, 2020, 08:26:46 PM »
And you're an idiot. Checkmate, fool!  :-*

ps. Let he who claims "nonsense" cast the 1st stone. Extract your head and try again.

I tried to engage you in a disscussion about the 7.65 mauser......  but you insist that it was found along with the carcano and there were actually two rifles there on the sixth floor....  I believe that is absurd.

Online Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
Re: Roger Craig
« Reply #215 on: April 19, 2020, 01:14:24 AM »
I tried to engage you in a disscussion about the 7.65 mauser......  but you insist that it was found along with the carcano and there were actually two rifles there on the sixth floor....  I believe that is absurd.

First off, I never insisted there were 2 rifles found on the 6th floor, only that you don't know that there weren't. I'm playing the devil's advocate that you can't be 100% certain that Craig and Weitzman were lying about seeing a Mauser in the TSBD just because it wasn't shown on Alyea's film footage. You think it's absurd because you buy into the testimony from the conspirators and you think that the Alyea film tells the whole story. But Alyea didn't film the hulls at the SN so does that mean they didn't exist? You know damn well the provenance for ALL the evidence is crap as well as shady. The DPD planted all the evidence, didn't they? They certainly weren't worried about getting their prints all over EVERYTHING.

I tried to have a discussion about the 7.65 Mauser with you but you glazed over. I only have a couple of questions for you:

1) Why would Weitzman have been shown a Mauser if it had nothing to do with the Big Event?
2) Why do you think the conspirators would not have placed a shooter in the SN so they could frame Oswald?

Answer my 2 absurd questions and we'll take it from there, if you dare.
« Last Edit: April 19, 2020, 01:32:40 AM by Jack Trojan »

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Roger Craig
« Reply #216 on: April 19, 2020, 01:49:53 AM »
First off, I never insisted there were 2 rifles found on the 6th floor, only that you don't know that there weren't. I'm playing the devil's advocate that you can't be 100% certain that Craig and Weitzman were lying about seeing a Mauser in the TSBD just because it wasn't shown on Alyea's film footage. You think it's absurd because you buy into the testimony from the conspirators and you think that the Alyea film tells the whole story. But Alyea didn't film the hulls at the SN so does that mean they didn't exist? You know damn well the provenance for ALL the evidence is crap as well as shady. The DPD planted all the evidence, didn't they? They certainly weren't worried about getting their prints all over EVERYTHING.

I tried to have a discussion about the 7.65 Mauser with you but you glazed over. I only have a couple of questions for you:

1) Why would Weitzman have been shown a Mauser if it had nothing to do with the Big Event?
2) Why do you think the conspirators would not have placed a shooter in the SN so they could frame Oswald?

Answer my 2 absurd questions and we'll take it from there, if you dare.

you can't be 100% certain that Craig and Weitzman were lying about seeing a Mause in the TSBD just because it wasn't shown on Alyea's film footage.

But it's not only not seen in the Alyea footage NOBODY reported seeing another rifle .... That is a fact.  We know that Boone Weitzman Craig, and others saw a rifle that they thought was a 7.65 Mauser but Alyea's footage shows the rifle was a carcano....and photographers outside the TSBD verified the Alyea footage.

you can't be 100% certain that Craig and Weitzman were lying about seeing a Mauser in the TSBD

I said Craig was lying.....I said NOTHING about Weitzman....except he was mistaken....and he admitted it.


I have two questions for you....
1) Why would Weitzman have been shown a Mauser if it had nothing to do with the Big Event?

2) Why do you think the conspirators would not have placed a shooter in the SN so they could frame Oswald?

Please answer the questions