Will we ever know what really happened?

[Paul May]

Studying Oswald?s history helps one understand this issue.  LHO may indeed have admired JFK as a person.  However, Oswald was not shooting at JFK, the person.  He was shooting at the POTUS and all that position represented in America and the world.

[Paul May]

Unanswerable question.  One of so many in the JFK event.

[John Iacoletti]

No, I?m just not prepared to make mountains out of molehills because somebody got a date wrong, or had the audacity to not have a photographic memory.

But you are prepared to make "mountains of evidence" out of molehills of assumption and conjecture.

[John Iacoletti]

Studying Oswald?s history helps one understand this issue.  LHO may indeed have admired JFK as a person.  However, Oswald was not shooting at JFK, the person.  He was shooting at the POTUS and all that position represented in America and the world.

What part of "Oswald's history" leads you to that conclusion?

[Dillon Rankine]

But you are prepared to make "mountains of evidence" out of molehills of assumption and conjecture.

What informs your view of my conduct in that way?

[John Iacoletti]

What informs your view of my conduct in that way?

Our past interactions where you argue the narrative, not the quality of the evidence.

[Dillon Rankine]

Our past interactions where you argue the narrative, not the quality of the evidence.

I don?t ever remember arguing ?the narrative? over evidence. But I seem to recall you doing something quite similar to this, when you dismissed the neuropsych evidence on faulty terms.