JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Will we ever know what really happened?
Dillon Rankine:
--- Quote from: Rob Caprio on September 06, 2018, 09:30:18 PM ---You NEVER use the evidence. When someone uses it you call for its removal. There isn't one piece of evidence that shows LHO shot anyone.
The evidence is genuine and it shows that a conspiracy was involved in the murder of JFK.
The debate will go on forever because people like you deny what the evidence actually shows.
--- End quote ---
Your excuse for evidence is:
-the opinion of 4 PH doctors (the minority) who thought JFK?s throat wound was an entrance
-misunderstanding of what ?occipital-parietal? means
-whatever some crackpot riftsnin their poorly worded CT tome
-thinking that the back of wound would?ve magically stopped and fell out all because one doctor put his finger in it (not a valid method)
-an unrealistic expectancy of perfection in the evidence (in your world, people never make mistakes)
-an uneducated and simplistic view of other complicated scientific issues
-blatant ignorance of all the things you don?t like (PH staff ?recalling? an impossible left temporal wound)
Need I go on? Point is, you?ve got nothing. You have not demonstrated the necessity of two gunmen to have caused all damage incurred during the shooting.
Rob Caprio:
--- Quote from: Nicholas Turner on September 06, 2018, 09:46:41 PM ---Do you mean there are no psychological studies or none that give insight?
--- End quote ---
None that give insight as LHO was normal.
Rob Caprio:
--- Quote from: Dillon Rankine on September 07, 2018, 01:30:31 AM ---Your excuse for evidence is:
-the opinion of 4 PH doctors (the minority) who thought JFK?s throat wound was an entrance
-misunderstanding of what ?occipital-parietal? means
-whatever some crackpot riftsnin their poorly worded CT tome
-thinking that the back of wound would?ve magically stopped and fell out all because one doctor put his finger in it (not a valid method)
-an unrealistic expectancy of perfection in the evidence (in your world, people never make mistakes)
-an uneducated and simplistic view of other complicated scientific issues
-blatant ignorance of all the things you don?t like (PH staff ?recalling? an impossible left temporal wound)
Need I go on? Point is, you?ve got nothing. You have not demonstrated the necessity of two gunmen to have caused all damage incurred during the shooting.
--- End quote ---
So you are Howard Gee? Sadly for you the majority of people read the evidence the way I do. I knew that you were a LNer. I was right again.
Howard Gee:
--- Quote from: Rob Caprio on September 06, 2018, 09:30:18 PM ---
The debate will go on forever because people like you deny what the evidence actually shows.
--- End quote ---
What year did Benavides die ?
Steve Howsley:
--- Quote from: Rob Caprio on September 07, 2018, 01:33:10 AM ---None that give insight as LHO was normal.
--- End quote ---
When did you last speak with him?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version