That Is Not Officer Haygood = Conspiracy! Prove Me Wrong Challenge

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
Paul May

Author Topic: That Is Not Officer Haygood = Conspiracy! Prove Me Wrong Challenge  (Read 37274 times)

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3284
Are you suggesting that some part of this film was cut out or edited?

Some film sequence that that caught a rifle being used from one of the 3 tramps the freight car behind the picket fence?

Dear Peon I mean Zeon,

Is English your second language?

-- Tom

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4778
Dear Peon I mean Zeon,

Is English your second language?

-- Tom

  Referring to someone as a "Peon" is uncalled for. There are people posting here from all around the world. 

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3284
Referring to someone as a "Peon" is uncalled for. There are people posting here from all around the world.

And you, Storing?

Are you posting from Russia?

One would think so -- straight from Putin's professional troll factory.

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4778
And you, Storing?

Are you posting from Russia?

One would think so -- straight from Putin's professional troll factory.

   You're way outta line calling Zeon a "peon".

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3284
You're way out of line calling Zeon a "peon".

Dear Royell,

You're right for a change. (Miracles never cease.)

My bad.

I apologize.

I'm sure Zeon isn't a "peon," even though he is grossly ignorant about the shots that hit JFK and JBC, and his . . .  aww . . . never mind.

-- Tom

Offline Zeon Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1169
Dear Royell,

You're right for a change. (Miracles never cease.)

My bad.

I apologize.

I'm sure Zeon isn't a "peon," even though he is grossly ignorant about the shots that hit JFK and JBC, and his . . .  aww . . . never mind.

-- Tom

Hey, Dom, er I mean Tom, you are the one (and virtually the  ONLY one) who has suggested that the 3 shots were spread out over 10-11 secs.

You keep confusing me with that Marjan (what’s his last name?) from Afghanistan or somewhere  ( the hooded avatar). HE is the one with the  looney idea that Hickey accidentally discharged his AR-15 rifle.

My opinion is that probably only 3  loud (unsuppressed) shots were fired from the TSBD 6th floor SE window at 12:30 beginning with 1st shot at Z223.  If that’s an opinion which you consider to be “grossly  ignorant about the shots which hit JFK and JC”, then you must be confusing me with Andrew Mason who is advocating the shooter shot the 1st shot thru the tree foliage at Z190.

Royell has had  some interesting observations though which could change my opinion on the total no.of shots fired, especially if one was a subsonic round fired from a suppressed rifle from some lower elevation and or direction.
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 11:41:35 PM by Zeon Mason »

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4778
Hey, Dom, er I mean Tom, you are the one (and virtually the  ONLY one) who has suggested that the 3 shots were spread out over 10-11 secs.

You keep confusing me with that Marjan (what’s his last name?) from Afghanistan or somewhere  ( the hooded avatar). HE is the one with the  looney idea that Hickey accidentally discharged his AR-15 rifle.

My opinion is that probably only 3  loud (unsuppressed) shots were fired from the TSBD 6th floor SE window at 12:30 beginning with 1st shot at Z223.  If that’s an opinion which you consider to be “grossly  ignorant about the shots which hit JFK and JC”, then you must be confusing me with Andrew Mason who is advocating the shooter shot the 1st shot thru the tree foliage at Z190.

Royell has had  some interesting observations though which could change my opinion on the total no.of shots fired, especially if one was a subsonic round fired from a suppressed rifle from some lower elevation and or direction.

   I thought it was interesting that when Josiah Thompson interviewed Sitzman for his "Six Seconds In Dallas" (1968) blockbuster book, she volunteered that a noise suppression/silencer could have been used. She reasoned that would explain why she did not hear any shots fired near her pedestal position. So, way back then there was wide spread discussion about a gun having been used with noise suppression.
   One of the reasons I have little confidence in EAR Witnesses detailing the number of shots fired, is that 1963 was only 18 yrs after WW 2. WC witnesses were almost Never asked about their hearing ability. Both Brehm and Willis were WW 2 vets. Brehm wounded during the D Day Invasion, and Willis was stationed at Pearl Harbor. Both had to of been hearing impaired.
    With respect to possible "lower level" shot(s) being fired, remember that on "The Men Who Killed Kennedy", the govt informant claimed he was told of a shooter being, "almost on the horizontal".