JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate

Z-317 shows no rearward blowout

<< < (3/5) > >>

Ray Mitcham:

--- Quote from: Jerry Organ on August 24, 2018, 05:38:58 PM ---Looks like Ray goes to the Cakebread Correspondence School of Gut-Feel Analysis.



Let's just say I wouldn't want a CT plumbing my doors.

--- End quote ---

Maybe you should plumb your photo first, Jerry.

Ray Mitcham:

--- Quote from: Jerry Organ on August 24, 2018, 06:17:43 PM ---Why? The area behind where Oswald is standing happens to be the most-true-to-vertical part of the 133A photo.

How about producing some graphics of your own? Gut feelings and vague hunches aren't that measurable.

--- End quote ---

Ray Mitcham:

--- Quote from: Tom Sorensen on August 24, 2018, 06:38:05 PM ---The Oswald tilt article by Farid:

https://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/farid/downloads/publications/jdfsl15.pdf

--- End quote ---

Thanks Tom. Note the difference in the vertical angle of the stair post in the Farid photo and the one submitted by Jerry.

Ray Mitcham:

--- Quote from: Tom Sorensen on August 24, 2018, 04:46:42 PM ---What's holding up the guy to the right... ???

--- End quote ---

Note the difference in the angle his right foot is sticking out to Oswald.

John Iacoletti:

--- Quote from: Jerry Organ on August 25, 2018, 02:46:31 AM ---Craig Lamson's graphic showing a 7? tilt when the perspective is corrected. True-verticals were found by Craig on the house, the post behind the left shoulder and the vertical on the far-right of the shed.

--- End quote ---

Interesting.  I know Craig still lurks here.  How was it determined that these are true verticals?  PM is fine.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version