JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Did Astronomy Play into Shot Targeting?
John Iacoletti:
--- Quote from: Joe Elliott on August 21, 2018, 01:00:13 AM --- Oswald?s fingerprint/palmprints on boxes found in the Domino room?
--- End quote ---
They probably were. He was reportedly in there often. As I keep pointing out, his job was to get books out of boxes. Often even on the 6th floor.
--- Quote ---Oswald?s rifle, with paperwork that connects to it Oswald, were found in the Domino room?
--- End quote ---
LOL. What you actually mean is that unscientific and biased handwriting "analysis" of two block letters on a photo of a microfilm copy of an 2-inch order coupon purports that he filled out the coupon, and paperwork allegedly printed from microfilm that is now "missing" shows the rifle associated with a PO box that Oswald had access to.
But how does any of that show that Oswald was in a 6th floor window shooting at the President?
--- Quote ---The same rifle had Oswald?s palmprints on it?
--- End quote ---
What you actually mean is that a single partial palmprint that arrived a week later on an index card was matched to Oswald.
But how does that show that Oswald was in a 6th floor window shooting at the President?
--- Quote ---A witness (who wasn?t Oswald) said he saw Oswald in the Domino room at 12:30?
--- End quote ---
As opposed to the witness who said he saw Oswald in the SE corner 6th floor 12:30? Oh yeah...the guy who failed to identify him in a rigged lineup even after seeing him on TV as the culprit, claimed to see him from the belt up at the time of the head shot, and gave a description that was the wrong age, wrong weight, wrong height, and wrong clothing to be Oswald.
--- Quote ---Wow, I had no idea the evidence of Oswald being in the Domino room at 12:30 was just as strong as the evidence that he was at the sniper?s window on the sixth floor.
--- End quote ---
They are equally strong. As I said, regarding Oswald's location at 12:30, your guess is as good or bad as anyone else's.
John Mytton:
--- Quote from: John Iacoletti on August 21, 2018, 06:24:56 PM ---They probably were. He was reportedly in there often. As I keep pointing out, his job was to get books out of boxes. Often even on the 6th floor.
LOL. What you actually mean is that unscientific and biased handwriting "analysis" of two block letters on a photo of a microfilm copy of an 2-inch order coupon purports that he filled out the coupon, and paperwork allegedly printed from microfilm that is now "missing" shows the rifle associated with a PO box that Oswald had access to.
But how does any of that show that Oswald was in a 6th floor window shooting at the President?
What you actually mean is that a single partial palmprint that arrived a week later on an index card was matched to Oswald.
But how does that show that Oswald was in a 6th floor window shooting at the President?
As opposed to the witness who said he saw Oswald in the SE corner 6th floor 12:30? Oh yeah...the guy who failed to identify him in a rigged lineup even after seeing him on TV as the culprit, claimed to see him from the belt up at the time of the head shot, and gave a description that was the wrong age, wrong weight, wrong height, and wrong clothing to be Oswald.
They are equally strong. As I said, regarding Oswald's location at 12:30, your guess is as good or bad as anyone else's.
--- End quote ---
Hilarious, you just don't get it, the fact that you have to provide bizarre contradictory excuses for each piece of powerful corroborated evidence just shows that your alternative just doesn't exist.
JohnM
John Iacoletti:
--- Quote from: John Mytton on August 27, 2018, 09:18:50 PM ---Hilarious, you just don't get it, the fact that you have to provide bizarre contradictory excuses for each piece of powerful corroborated evidence just shows that your alternative just doesn't exist.
--- End quote ---
Actually it is you who has to provide bizarre contradictory excuses for why your dubious, conflicting, contradictory evidence is still "powerful and corroborated".
John Mytton:
--- Quote from: John Iacoletti on August 28, 2018, 12:17:19 AM ---Actually it is you who has to provide bizarre contradictory excuses for why your dubious, conflicting, contradictory evidence is still "powerful and corroborated".
--- End quote ---
Excuses are the very foundation of the CT movement.
JohnM
John Iacoletti:
--- Quote from: John Mytton on August 28, 2018, 12:45:11 AM ---Excuses are the very foundation of the CT movement.
--- End quote ---
The canonical list of LN excuses for inconvenient evidence:
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,100.0.html
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version