Oswald put his package straight into Frazier's car, why?

[Bill Chapman]

FRAZIER: "What's happening, Linnie?"

Silence.

Again, you are transferring what you might/would have done to what she would have done. 

[Bill Chapman]

Why not?

When Frazier himself speaks you guys claim he is lying "mistaken"....

So, what difference does it make?

I don't recall saying Frazier was mistaken/lying. But I do recall him repeating, multiple times, that he wasn't paying attention to the bag.

[Bill Chapman]

Who corroborated her peeking out the back door?

Why is that important to you? Are you calling her a liar?

[Martin Weidmann]

I don't recall saying Frazier was mistaken/lying. But I do recall him repeating, multiple times, that he wasn't paying attention to the bag.

So, he didn't pay attention to the bag, but he wasn't lying/mistaken when he said how long the bag he had seen was. Got it!

[Bill Chapman]

Why did Oswald feel the need to hide his package ASAP

"Hide the package"?.... On the backseat of a car?  LOL

Let me guess where you are going with this..... Oswald placing the package on the backseat of Frazier's car means (1) there was a rifle in it and (2) he shot Kennedy. Am I right?

When you are not being obnoxious, you are sometimes very funny. Thanks for the laugh!

"Hide the package"?.... On the backseat of a car?  LOL

That position would reveal less of the package (to an extent), if Oswald that was Oswald's intent.
In fact, Buell testified that he, himself, had the habit of glancing over his shoulder whenever he got into his car.
Possibly not knowing that little quirk, Oswald might have been banking on Buell not looking into the back seat at all.

Oswald placing the package on the backseat of Frazier's car means (1) there was a rifle in it and (2) he shot Kennedy. Am I right?

Are you sure WC supporters are claiming Oswald guilty based solely on a package placed on the back seat of Buell's car?

[Bill Chapman]

So, he didn't pay attention to the bag, but he wasn't lying/mistaken when he said how long the bag he had seen was. Got it!

He only said he didn't pay attention to the bag. Ad nauseum.
'Methinks the lady doth protest too much' perhaps?

Do you think it possible that he (and Randle) had an 'uh, oh' moment when it finally dawned on him that he had driven the prime suspect to the scene, 'mystery' package and all?

[Martin Weidmann]

"Hide the package"?.... On the backseat of a car?  LOL

That position would reveal less of the package (to an extent), if Oswald that was Oswald's intent.
In fact, Buell testified that he, himself, had the habit of glancing over his shoulder whenever he got into his car.
Possibly not knowing that little quirk, Oswald might have been banking on Buell not looking into the back seat at all.

Oswald placing the package on the backseat of Frazier's car means (1) there was a rifle in it and (2) he shot Kennedy. Am I right?

Are you sure WC supporters are claiming Oswald guilty based solely on a package placed on the back seat of Buell's car?

Are you sure WC supporters are claiming Oswald guilty based solely on a package placed on the back seat of Buell's car?

Oh, no... not really. And I never said that. There are actually plenty more fantasy driven reasons they use to make that silly claim for which there really isn't solid evidence whatsoever.