JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Oswald put his package straight into Frazier's car, why?
Martin Weidmann:
--- Quote from: Bill Chapman on January 14, 2018, 10:18:15 PM ---'Silly'
So that's all you've got, huh. A drive-by line.
If you have information that proves that anyone other than the shooter knew there was to be an attempt made on Kennedy that day, by all means post it.
--- End quote ---
'Silly'
Of course, silly... Oswald left his wedding ring in Irving, he did not read the morning paper as usual etc etc.... it is beyond silly!
If you have information that proves that anyone other than the shooter knew there was to be an attempt made on Kennedy that day, by all means post it.
I am sure that the shooter(s) knew it was going to happen, but that's hardly the point now, is it?
Can you prove that Oswald was the shooter or are you just assuming he was?
Bill Chapman:
--- Quote from: Martin Weidmann on January 14, 2018, 10:00:20 PM ---He only said he didn't pay attention to the bag. Ad nauseum.
'Methinks the lady doth protest too much' perhaps?
"Ad nauseum"? Lol.... he only said it a few times during his WC testimony.... an easy way of avoiding having to go where they wanted him to go.
Prior to his WC testimony Frazier did not say a word about "not paying attention". In his first day statements he actually described to Lt Day that the bag Oswald carried was "definitely a thin, flimsy sack like the one purchased in a dime store" and he told polygrapher R.D. Lewis that it was a ?crickly brown paper sack?/ A few days later he told FBI agents Odum and McNeely that "the package was wrapped in a cheap, crinkly, thin paper sack, such as that provided by Five and Ten Cent Stores?. It's all in the record!
About 16 hours after he had seen Oswald carry that bag, he was shown the bag found at the TSBD while being polygraphed and he denied it was the bag he had seen.....
So much for "not paying attention" months later!
--- End quote ---
"Ad nauseum"? Lol.... he only said it a few times during his WC testimony.... an easy way of avoiding having to go where they wanted him to go.
LOL
I can tell you where he didn't want to go: JAIL.
And what better way to have a chance to cover his butt (as the one chauffeured the prime suspect to the workplace, mind you) than to lie his arse off, claiming a bag length apparently way too small for a rifle?
Bill Chapman:
--- Quote from: Martin Weidmann on January 14, 2018, 10:39:33 PM ---'Silly'
Of course, silly... Oswald left his wedding ring in Irving, he did not read the morning paper as usual etc etc.... it is beyong silly!
If you have information that proves that anyone other than the shooter knew there was to be an attempt made on Kennedy that day, by all means post it.
I am sure that the shooter(s) knew it was going to happen, but that's hardly the point now, is it?
--- End quote ---
I am sure that the shooter(s) knew it was going to happen...
Stop misquoting me. I said if anyone else BUT the shooter knew about the attempt in advance
... but that's hardly the point now, is it?
On the contrary: The main point is if Oswald did it alone
Can you prove that Oswald was the shooter or are you just assuming he was?
I've never claimed I could prove anything here.
Martin Weidmann:
--- Quote from: Bill Chapman on January 14, 2018, 10:45:52 PM ---"Ad nauseum"? Lol.... he only said it a few times during his WC testimony.... an easy way of avoiding having to go where they wanted him to go.
LOL
I can tell you where he didn't want to go: JAIL.
And what better way to have a chance to cover his butt (as the one chauffeured the prime suspect to the workplace, mind you) than to lie his arse off, claiming a bag length apparently way too small for a rifle?
--- End quote ---
So now you are claiming he lied after all? You're so predictable!
But please explain his first day statements about a flimsy bag.... you know, the statements you are ignoring!
Martin Weidmann:
--- Quote from: Bill Chapman on January 14, 2018, 11:00:04 PM ---I am sure that the shooter(s) knew it was going to happen...
Stop misquoting me. I said if anyone else BUT the shooter knew about the attempt in advance
... but that's hardly the point now, is it?
On the contrary: The main point is if Oswald did it alone
Can you prove that Oswald was the shooter or are you just assuming he was?
I've never claimed I could prove anything here.
--- End quote ---
--- Quote ---I am sure that the shooter(s) knew it was going to happen...
Stop misquoting me. I said if anyone else BUT the shooter knew about the attempt in advance
--- End quote ---
I'm not misquoting you. You just didn't understand the answer.
--- Quote ---... but that's hardly the point now, is it?
On the contrary: The main point is if Oswald did it alone
--- End quote ---
"If"... what kind of point is that?
--- Quote ---Can you prove that Oswald was the shooter or are you just assuming he was?
I've never claimed I could prove anything here.
--- End quote ---
So you can't prove a damned thing, yet you throw your accusations out there nevertheless... Got it!
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version