JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Oswald put his package straight into Frazier's car, why?
Jerry Freeman:
--- Quote from: Steve Howsley on June 16, 2018, 05:58:45 AM ---
He was wearing a tee shirt which can easily be used as a cleaning cloth even when still be worn. That would be simple, close to hand and reasonably effective.
--- End quote ---
It would be physically impossible to wipe a rifle down with a shirt you are wearing and then hide it somewhere without leaving prints on it again. An otherwise interesting theory...but it's just plain silly.
Jerry Freeman:
CE 1303 and 1304
That is a guitar strap
Look like a different strap? ---A different rifle?
Steve Howsley:
--- Quote from: Jerry Freeman on June 16, 2018, 07:02:14 AM ---It would be physically impossible to wipe a rifle down with a shirt you are wearing and then hide it somewhere without leaving prints on it again. An otherwise interesting theory...but it's just plain silly.
--- End quote ---
Not at all impossible. There were smudges of prints on the rifle as a result of a rough but effective wiping attempt.
Zeon Mason:
didn't find any prints on the strap either.
But hey what the heck you know , :( no problem
Only in LN world could you forcefully grip a rifle, a strap, a paper bag, multiple times, with bare hands and not leave but one palm print on the bag, and leaving NO prints on any part of the rifle, nor on shells, or the clip, or the strap.
And the LT Day "barrel palm print" BS: Not confirmed by FBI fingerprint expert Latona, nor by FBI agent Drain, and only after the mortician saw FBI agents entering and taking prints from Oswalds dead body was anything known by FBI about a palm print on the barrel. Not seen by (nor heard Lt.Day mention a print), by Tom Alyea who was filming Day dusting the rifle.
And a "smudge" on trigger housing ::)
LNs whom refute a logical question with "you are not a fingerprint expert" or that "you must get information from movies; U2 non fingerprint experts, can demonstrate how it is even remotely probable to have only left a single palm print on the CE 142 bag and no prints on the rifle, clip, shells, any parts of rifle assembled, stock, scope.
Explain how silver nitrate process which can expose prints made weeks, months, even YEARS old, could somehow find no trace of any palm print at the places that Buell W.Frazier and Linnie May Randle saw Oswald carry the paper bag package.
These explanations below, I cannot really accept as plausible:
1. The light rain washed away completely the salt residue from the paper bag, when Oswald carried it to BWF car and washed it again when he carried from BWF car to the back door of the loading dock annex. So the silver nitrate did not expose but one palm print made inside TSBD which salt residue remained on the bag, even as the bag was carried along by Montgomery outside of TSBD.
2. Oswald was using a hankerchief but forgot later to use the hankerchief when moving boxes, except for when he remembered when he placed box on the window ledge.
3. Oswald used gloves when he made the bag in TSBD but forgot later and grabbed the bag with his barehands, but just one time, before he then realized he needed to stop doing that and carry it with a rag.
Jerry Freeman:
--- Quote from: Steve Howsley on June 16, 2018, 07:43:51 AM --- ... a rough but effective wiping attempt.
--- End quote ---
...said the Port-o-Let.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version