Oswald put his package straight into Frazier's car, why?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Oswald put his package straight into Frazier's car, why?  (Read 115804 times)

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Oswald put his package straight into Frazier's car, why?
« Reply #147 on: January 26, 2018, 11:40:57 PM »
Saying Iacoletti's image is "greatly enlarged" doesn't mean anything.  I think the term you're looking for is that Iacoletti (as he stated) posted a high-resolution scan.

I have no problem admitting I am wrong, when it is shown that I am wrong.

First, I need to study the image of the note from Hosty's book that Iacoletti used.  At a quick glance, it doesn't look anything like the image being discussed.  The problem is, I don't have Hosty's book.

Billy Bob.....You;ve been posting that image for the last few days....saying you don't have a copy of the note is a damned lie....

Man up and admit you're wrong.....

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Oswald put his package straight into Frazier's car, why?
« Reply #148 on: June 13, 2018, 06:01:35 PM »
Well, this topic had just about the mystery and excitement of a used condom.
Featuring the Three Amigos and their Musketeer [Oswald did it] friends.
Surprisingly, there was no rifle photo links supplied [after 21 pages of drivel]
The Randle house pictures....were silly.
 The proposed paper sack photos would show the ludicrous concept of smuggling a disassembled rifle through the entry of a workplace -completely unobserved.

  Dan Rather demonstrates how a bag containing suspect hardware might appear....
 



Where is the FBI or Dallas Police demonstration of the presumed packaging of a dismantled rifle?
Of course, a rifle scope would be rendered useless rattling around the package.

Below is 'the paper bag' concealing a dangerous broom handle.


 

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5118
Re: Oswald put his package straight into Frazier's car, why?
« Reply #149 on: June 14, 2018, 04:53:27 AM »
Well, this topic had just about the mystery and excitement of a used condom.
Featuring the Three Amigos and their Musketeer [Oswald did it] friends.
Surprisingly, there was no rifle photo links supplied [after 21 pages of drivel]
The Randle house pictures....were silly.
 The proposed paper sack photos would show the ludicrous concept of smuggling a disassembled rifle through the entry of a workplace -completely unobserved.

  Dan Rather demonstrates how a bag containing suspect hardware might appear....
 



Where is the FBI or Dallas Police demonstration of the presumed packaging of a dismantled rifle?
Of course, a rifle scope would be rendered useless rattling around the package.

Below is 'the paper bag' concealing a dangerous broom handle.


 




Thanks for the bump and I'm sure your CT friends will be really impressed with you describing their contributions as drivel.



JohnM

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: Oswald put his package straight into Frazier's car, why?
« Reply #150 on: June 14, 2018, 02:28:50 PM »
John, it looks like Dan's bag is sealed at both ends. Care to provide any evidence that both ends of CE142 were ever in that condition? Or maybe Oswald believed gravity would suffice.

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Oswald put his package straight into Frazier's car, why?
« Reply #151 on: June 15, 2018, 04:40:40 AM »



Thanks for the bump and I'm sure your CT friends will be really impressed with you describing their contributions as drivel.



JohnM

After reviewing the thread...and the idea that Oswald spirited a disassembled rifle to the car and to the building and through the building without getting quizzed -'Hey whatcha got there?'...by anybody....is comical at best.
Drivel?...Oh I'm guilty too maybe..occasionally                         

Did we not see the video I posted where Wes Frazier renounced his entire testimony [now that he feels safe to do so] ??

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: Oswald put his package straight into Frazier's car, why?
« Reply #152 on: June 15, 2018, 05:03:01 AM »
John, it looks like Dan's bag is sealed at both ends. Care to provide any evidence that both ends of CE142 were ever in that condition? Or maybe Oswald believed gravity would suffice.

I assume the official story has Oswald manufacturing the bag on site on Thursday. At that time he seals one end with a flap structure and leaves the other end open. In doing so he also creates a bag with determined width and a length that cannot accommodate the fully assembled rifle. Was the width also able to accommodate an assembled rifle ie. with scope attached?

I can see no evidence of any defined fold at the open and of the bag. Would not the disassembled rifle not have allowed for a fold down of one or 2 inches?

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5118
Re: Oswald put his package straight into Frazier's car, why?
« Reply #153 on: June 15, 2018, 05:44:02 AM »
John, it looks like Dan's bag is sealed at both ends. Care to provide any evidence that both ends of CE142 were ever in that condition? Or maybe Oswald believed gravity would suffice.


We know from both Linnie and Buell that Oswald carried a long bag which he put on the backseat of Frazier's car but Oswald denied both innocent events, why on Earth would Oswald feel compelled to lie about the purely mundane?


Mr. BALL. When you did ask him about the sack, you did ask him about it, a sack at one time bringing a sack to work that morning?
Mr. FRITZ. Yes; I did.
Mr. BALL. And you asked him the size and shape of the sack, didn't you?
Mr. FRITZ. He never admitted bringing the sack. I showed him the size probably in asking him if he brought a sack that size and he denied it. He said he brought his lunch was all he brought.
Mr. BALL. Didn't he say when you asked him the size and shape of the sack that he had with him, he said, "I don't recall, it may have been a small sack or a large sack. You don't always find one that fits your sandwiches," something like that.
Mr. FRITZ. That might be true but he said it was a small sack. He said it was a lunch sack.
Mr. BALL. Didn't you ask him where he usually kept his sacks, how he carried it when he came to work in the car?
Mr. FRITZ. I asked him where he had the sack---his lunch, and he said he had it in the front seat with him.
Mr. BALL. Did you ask him if he put any sack in the back seat?
Mr. FRITZ. He said he did not.



Mr. BELIN. What was that about curtain rods?
Mr. HOLMES. Asked him if he brought a sack out when he got in the car with this young fellow that hauled him and he said, "Yes."
"What was in the sack?"
"Well, my lunch."
"What size sack did you have?"
He said, "Oh, I don't know what size sack. You don't always get a sack that fits your sandwiches. It might be a big sack."
"Was it a long sack?''
"Well, it could have been"
"What did you do with it?"
"Carried it in my lap."
"You didn't put it over in the back seat?"
"No." He said he wouldn't have done that.
"Well, someone said the fellow that hauled you said you had a long package which you said was curtain rods you were taking to somebody at work and you laid it over on the back seat."
He said, "Well, they was just mistaken. That must have been some other time he picked me up."
That is all he said about it.




JohnM