When inconvenient evidence like Kellerman's flurry of shells testimony comes up
I don't understand, what's so inconvenient about this testimony, what was he describing?
A flurry of shots/shells coming into the car.
Maybe he should have used the word volley if that is what he intended to . Are there any other witnesses that back up his claim? He also said that JFK spoke after the throat wound which nobody backs. I have a hard time believing him.
Yep, just as I thought you got nothing.
Just as I thought. You'll make up any story and pretend that it's a fact. "Mytton's" Fabrications, anyone?