JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Gorilla Lovelady - Roscoe White
Joffrey van de Wiel:
I don't understand the purpose of this discussion. Summarized, the hypothesis is:
a) Billy Lovelady and Gorilla Lovelady are two different individuals
b) Gorilla Lovelady is Officer-in-Training Roscoe White
c) Roscoe White was not involved in the assassination
d) the assassination was faked as per Patrick's previous hypothesis
Then why debate it? What are we trying to establish here?
Michael Walton:
--- Quote from: Joffrey van de Wiel on July 25, 2018, 02:36:09 AM ---I don't understand the purpose of this discussion. Summarized, the hypothesis is:
a) Billy Lovelady and Gorilla Lovelady are two different individuals
b) Gorilla Lovelady is Officer-in-Training Roscoe White
c) Roscoe White was not involved in the assassination
d) the assassination was faked as per Patrick's previous hypothesis
Then why debate it? What are we trying to establish here?
--- End quote ---
The reason is simple. People see what they want to see, not what's actually there. It happens all of the time in this case.
Patrick Jackson:
--- Quote from: Joffrey van de Wiel on July 25, 2018, 02:36:09 AM ---I don't understand the purpose of this discussion. Summarized, the hypothesis is:
a) Billy Lovelady and Gorilla Lovelady are two different individuals
b) Gorilla Lovelady is Officer-in-Training Roscoe White
c) Roscoe White was not involved in the assassination
d) the assassination was faked as per Patrick's previous hypothesis
Then why debate it? What are we trying to establish here?
--- End quote ---
The purpose is to prove it. To attract more researchers and try to find more photos of Roscoe White. Once we do this, we will prove that Billy Nolan Lovelady was not wearing that plaid shirt.
Patrick Jackson:
--- Quote from: Michael Walton on July 25, 2018, 02:41:33 AM ---The reason is simple. People see what they want to see, not what's actually there. It happens all of the time in this case.
--- End quote ---
People see what majorty sees, not what's actually there. I see something else and trying to find more clues. If the majority would even try to help a bit, it might start seeing different things.
Joffrey van de Wiel:
--- Quote from: Patrick Jackson on July 25, 2018, 05:41:17 AM ---The purpose is to prove it. To attract more researchers and try to find more photos of Roscoe White. Once we do this, we will prove that Billy Nolan Lovelady was not wearing that plaid shirt.
--- End quote ---
Suppose you can prove that Billy Lovelady was not wearing a plaid shirt. This will lead us to...where exactly?
You are a determined and persistent researcher Patrick, but sometimes I feel you are chasing windmills. No disrespect intended.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version