What?s the MINIMUM number of people required for your CT to work?

[John Iacoletti]

Let us know when you've actually got something. Until then it's fair to say you've got nothing.

Let us know when you come up with something other than faith to show that the "something" you think you've got is actually true.  Until then, it's fair to say that you're just blowing smoke.  That's the difference between you and me.  I don't just make up an answer and cling to it.

BTW are you associated with the people who sit around the grave of St Oswald of Dallas every October 18 wishing him a happy birthday?

No, but I have visited his grave.  What difference does it make?

[Steve Howsley]

Let us know when you come up wit something other than faith to show that the "something" you think you've got is actually true.  Until then, it's fair to say that you're just blowing smoke.  That's the difference between you and me.  I don't just make up an answer and cling to it.

No, but I have visited his grave.  What difference does it make?

Two commissions later and you don't even have a theory. Like I said you've got nothing just as you've admitted.

[John Iacoletti]

You sure are repetitive.

Almost 55 years later and you still can't demonstrate that your conclusion is true.  It must be so frustrating after all this time to have nothing besides a desperate attempt to shift the burden of proof over and over again to try to hide your repeated failures.  Why are you so arrogant to think that you are just automatically right by default?  You actually believe that it's better to have a "theory" that you can't justify than to just admit that you don't know.

[Steve Howsley]

You sure are repetitive.

Almost 55 years later and you still can't demonstrate that your conclusion is true.  It must be so frustrating after all this time to have nothing besides a desperate attempt to shift the burden of proof over and over again to try to hide your repeated failures.  Why are you so arrogant to think that you are just automatically right by default?  You actually believe that it's better to have a "theory" that you can't justify than to just admit that you don't know.

55 years later with a large stack of conspiracy books to fall back on and you still haven't got the courage to argue for a theory. You have nothing. You simply bleat BS day after day. Here's an idea; stand up, be a man not a mouse; make a positive statement with an ounce of evidence as to how the assassination unfolded. I know why you won't; it's because you have nothing at all that will stand up to scrutiny. Zilch, zero, diddly, zippo is the sum of your conviction.

[John Iacoletti]

55 years later with a large stack of conspiracy books to fall back on and you still haven't got the courage to argue for a theory. You have nothing. You simply bleat BS day after day. Here's an idea; stand up, be a man not a mouse; make a positive statement with an ounce of evidence as to how the assassination unfolded. I know why you won't; it's because you have nothing at all that will stand up to scrutiny. Zilch, zero, diddly, zippo is the sum of your conviction.

"Courage" - LOL

It's called intellectual honesty.  Perhaps you should look into it.  You are not honest enough to admit that your BS doesn't stand up to scrutiny, so all you can do is deflect.  You have yet to provide an ounce of evidence for your own "manly" conviction.  All you can do is talk trash.  Why is that?

[Jake Maxwell]

Driver SS agent Bill Greer's rubbernecking to the back of the limousine until Kennedy is shot, and braking at the wall corner, but then giving a lame explanation of his braking, claiming he thought there might have been a flat tire

Hoover stating in a memo only hours after the assassination, how important it was to convince the public that Oswald killed the president

LBJ's mistress testifying that LBJ hated Kennedy, and suggesting LBJ attended a meeting prior to the assassination that was possibly a briefing of events about to happen

Orville Nix claiming that his film didn't look the same when it was returned from the FBI and other signs of film/photo tampering (Were there some on site assigned to document those who had cameras and film to confiscate?)

A higher than expected percentage of deaths among those who might have had insider info, as some researchers have suggested
and etc...

It could have been a very large group of conspirators, indeed... but no one knows how large...


SS agent, Bill Greer, looking back toward the president, until JFK is shot...

[Steve Howsley]

"Courage" - LOL

It's called intellectual honesty.  Perhaps you should look into it.  You are not honest enough to admit that your BS doesn't stand up to scrutiny, so all you can do is deflect.  You have yet to provide an ounce of evidence for your own "manly" conviction.  All you can do is talk trash.  Why is that?

Again you fail. You've got nothing as you have already admitted. What you do have is a truck load of sweet FA. Come on John, put something forward or admit that you refuse to even step onto the ground preferring instead to sit in the bleachers where you can pretend to know more than the coaches and claim that you could perform better than the players if only you weren't addicted to hot dogs.

Pathetic.