What?s the MINIMUM number of people required for your CT to work?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: What?s the MINIMUM number of people required for your CT to work?  (Read 126505 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: What?s the minimum number of people required for your CT to work?
« Reply #28 on: July 19, 2018, 07:46:17 PM »
Of course we can only comment relating to conspiracies, successful or not that have been eventually unveiled. One might argue that the most successful conspiracies have never been discovered.

And you lot are just the ones to dream them up.

To wit, the accused:

42 groups
84 shooters
214 people

Yield: SFA

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: What?s the minimum number of people required for your CT to work?
« Reply #29 on: July 19, 2018, 09:53:38 PM »
Based on the typical responses of any number of CT's at a least a Hundred, but ask any of these same CT's how big the Conspiracy was and they will always say it was only a small conspiracy! Go figure?
Caprio, Weidmann and Iacoletti are classic examples of this Tardis like logic.

No, that would be the strawman conspiracy that the ODIA nuts like to pretend that a conspiracy would have to be.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: What?s the minimum number of people required for your CT to work?
« Reply #30 on: July 19, 2018, 09:58:23 PM »
5) Alex Hidell**

** In charge of weapon procurement

Alex?  Mr. "does his research" strikes again!




Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
Re: What?s the minimum number of people required for your CT to work?
« Reply #31 on: July 19, 2018, 10:32:15 PM »
Ok, here we go, minimal:

Allen Dulles - 1
James Angleton - 1
  -CIA underlings (Oswald/de Mohrenschildt/etc.)- ~10
J. Edger Hoover - 1
  -FBI underlings - ~20
  -DPD stooges - ~6
  -SS sellouts - ~5
Lyndon Johnson - 1
Assassins - 5
========
Total = ~50
« Last Edit: July 19, 2018, 10:37:19 PM by Jack Trojan »

Online Steve Howsley

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
Re: What?s the minimum number of people required for your CT to work?
« Reply #32 on: July 19, 2018, 10:59:50 PM »
Ok, here we go, minimal:

Allen Dulles - 1
James Angleton - 1
  -CIA underlings (Oswald/de Mohrenschildt/etc.)- ~10
J. Edger Hoover - 1
  -FBI underlings - ~20
  -DPD stooges - ~6
  -SS sellouts - ~5
Lyndon Johnson - 1
Assassins - 5
========
Total = ~50

No Ruby?
No bent doctors?
No mother and son impersonators?
No Paine's or Wes Frazier and sister?
No Truly?

Online Steve M. Galbraith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1872
Re: What?s the minimum number of people required for your CT to work?
« Reply #33 on: July 19, 2018, 11:33:35 PM »
No Ruby?
No bent doctors?
No mother and son impersonators?
No Paine's or Wes Frazier and sister?
No Truly?

He thinks Oswald was "sheep dipped." So we have the CIA handlers/trainers/operatives who knew about his activity prior to the assassination. It couldn't just be Angleton. Others such as, let's say, David Phillips et al.

Then the WC coverup.

I like how under "LBJ" it's just one: him. No underlings? I thought Katzenbach was part of it?

It's fascinating how they try to make it small but when they're asked for details and specifics it grows exponentially.

Online Steve Howsley

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
Re: What?s the minimum number of people required for your CT to work?
« Reply #34 on: July 20, 2018, 03:48:42 AM »
He thinks Oswald was "sheep dipped." So we have the CIA handlers/trainers/operatives who knew about his activity prior to the assassination. It couldn't just be Angleton. Others such as, let's say, David Phillips et al.

Then the WC coverup.

I like how under "LBJ" it's just one: him. No underlings? I thought Katzenbach was part of it?

It's fascinating how they try to make it small but when they're asked for details and specifics it grows exponentially.

It's also simply not credible to think that everyone involved either directly or indirectly* has remained silent for over 5 decades. Except of course for a couple of incorrigible liars in Hunt and Ventura. Surely someone would say something to clear their conscience and attempt to see some form of justice by having the official record corrected.




* i.e. not made aware of the master plan but soon realised how they were duped yet still decide to remain silent forever. I'd imagine many of these would be honest people living ordinary lives who have a natural sense of right and wrong.