JFK Assassination Forum 
Logo
Home Support The Forum The Robin Unger JFK Assassination GalleryYoutube JFK Assassination Video ChannelSearchNotepadLoginRegister

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2017, 06:53:09 PM
News: Posts and threads containing swear words, personal insults or crudities, content considered by Admin to be spamming, when reported or observed, may be edited or deleted.
The perpetrator of any offense may receive a posting suspension of a period to be determined by Admin in relation to the considered severity of the offense.
Questions relating to deletions or edits will not be answered by Admin via any communication method here or elsewhere.

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 ... 32
The Key To The Snow Job Of The WC  (Read 14171 times)

Super Member
*****

Posts: 4374


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
So many words to simply confirm that you in reality do not accept the witness statement by Buell Frazier....

You just want to cherry pick what you believe and what not and you are doing so without having been there yourself to see it first hand.


Humans are not precise in estimating the length of objects.  That is why they invented things like rulers to measure them.

Yes, and a ruler is exactly what the FBI used to measure the length from Frazier's car door to where the package reached on the backseat.

No guessing there...  There is no ambiguity at all to an observation to where a package reached.

If you accept the 27" seat measurement, do you then acknowledge that Frazier couldn't possibly have seen the package being carried between Oswald's cupped hand and armpit, because that measurement is about 20"?


-------------------------

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 7906


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
No.  It is the difference between the testimony of those actually present (i.e. evidence) and an Internet loon who apparently hates the police for his own subjective reasons and therefore conjures up a fantasy scenario to confirm his bias.   

Actually you're the Internet loon who thinks (despite lots of evidence to the contrary) that if a cop says something it must be true.


-------------------------

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 7906


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
And Oswald had done nothing warranting arrest?  He snuck into a movie theater without buying a ticket.

Unfortunately for you, they didn't even have evidence at the time they approached him in the theater that he "snuck into a movie theater without buying a ticket", much less killed anybody.

Quote
 Add to it his proximity in time and place to the murder of a police officer and his suspicious behavior is more than sufficient cause for the police to question him.

They didn't just question him, they conducted an illegal stop and frisk.

Quote
 He then strikes a police officer and pulls a gun.  Ample reasons for his arrest.  

Of course he did.  The "Captor of Oswald" said so.


-------------------------

   ReplyReply
Super Member
*****

Posts: 5329


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

If you accept the 27" seat measurement, do you then acknowledge that Frazier couldn't possibly have seen the package being carried between Oswald's cupped hand and armpit, because that measurement is about 20"?


Why would the one exclude the other?

The bag could have been about 27 inch in size, yet contain a smaller item of perhaps some 20 inch, allowing it to be carried in the way Frazier described.



-------------------------

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 7906


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Ugh.  I explained this before.  It is very simple.  The "1:40" arrest report on 11/22 notes that Oswald was "deceased."

Where does the arrest report say that Oswald is deceased?

Quote
You think Oswald paid for his movie ticket?  What evidence do you have for that?  The only witnesses who were there and in a position to know indicate he did not buy a movie ticket but snuck into the theatre.

Your claim, your burden.  Neither Brewer or Postal saw him enter the theater and Postal wasn't sure if he bought a ticket or not.  So who are these witnesses you speak of?


-------------------------

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 7906


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Mr. BELIN - Then did you know when you saw him walk in and when you walked up to Julia Postal that he had not bought a ticket?
Mr. BREWER - I knew that he hadn't.


He can't even keep his story straight.  If this was actually true, then why would he ask Postal if she sold him a ticket?


-------------------------

   ReplyReply
Super Member
*****

Posts: 10453


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Unfortunately for you, they didn't even have evidence at the time they approached him in the theater that he "snuck into a movie theater without buying a ticket", much less killed anybody.

They didn't just question him, they conducted an illegal stop and frisk.

Of course he did.  The "Captor of Oswald" said so.

When you hold the story about Lee allegedly sneaking in to the theater up to scrutiny it does not ring true.....  Lee didn't show any sign of panic in any of the encounters prior to his arrest, including the approach of DPD officer Mc Donald in the theater.....  So IF he had committed a crime he most crtainly would not have wanted to call attention to himself by failing to purchase a 50 cent ticket.

And he was offered something to cover his face when he was taken from the squad car at the police station...... but he declined and said..." Why would I hide my face ??  I haven't done anything that I'm ashamed of"........


-------------------------

   ReplyReply

Super Member
*****

Posts: 21661


As a guest, you are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Ugh.  The humanity!  No one would need to be clairvoyent when writing the time of the arrest on the report later that day.  Whew.   At some point AFTER Oswald is arrested, an arrest report was written.  It notes the time of his arrest as "1:40".  That does not mean the report itself was written at "1:40".  LOL.  I can't believe anyone - even you - would be dumb enough to make such a bizarre claim over and over.  Particularly while acknowledging the report contains information about events that occurred long after 1:40.  

Ugh is right. LHO was NOT arrested at 1:40 p.m., but the arrest report says that he was.  It is clear by now that you cannot explain this or show using the evidence that it was correct so we have to go with the explanation of foreknowledge of what was going to happen. There is no way that the DPD could have known about, let alone suspect, LHO at 1:40 p.m. IF this was a legitimate case of police work.

Your attempts at trying to cover this truth up have failed.


-------------------------

   ReplyReply
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 ... 32


Jump to:  

JFK Assassination Forum Assassination of JFK discussion and debate surrounding the assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy In Dealey Plaza Texas on November 22nd 1963

JFK Assassination Photographs Gallery

JFK Assassination Forum Assassination of JFK discussion and debate surrounding the assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy In Dealey Plaza Texas on November 22nd 1963
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines