|
|
 August 09, 2009, 04:03:18 AM
|
Super Member
Posts: 1290
|
As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginJOHN McADAMS SAID (TO A CONSPIRACY KOOK): "I assume this means you entirely reject the "Howard Hunt confession," since it flatly contradicts this "Marcello confession"." I THEN SAID: Indeed, John. Good point. It must be hard for conspiracy theorists these days. They don't know which unsupportable "confession" from some blowhard mobster they should believe on any given day. Should they believe Marcello or Hunt? Or maybe Jimmy Files? There are just too many cooks (and crooks, and kooks) in the kitchen....and too many unconnectable plotters in Dallas. But, never fear -- the day is coming when some stalwart conspiracy monger will author a new book that "connects" all of these people, in the new tome entitled--- "THE JFK ASSASSINATION: THE KITCHEN SINK MURDER (STARRING CARLOS MARCELLO, CLAY SHAW, DAVID FERRIE, GUY BANISTER, E. HOWARD HUNT, JAMES FILES, LYNDON B. JOHNSON, JIMMY HOFFA, SANTO TRAFFICANTE, THE CIA, THE FBI, MARILYN MONROE'S MAID, A PATSY PLOT THAT COULDN'T WORK EVEN IN A DREAM, AND ONE GUY WITH AN UMBRELLA)" [©2018 "The More The Merrier" Publishing House, Inc.] As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
-------------------------
|
|
|
« Last Edit: August 09, 2009, 05:43:41 AM by David Von Pein »
|
-------------------------
|
|
|
 Reply |
|
|
 Jsnow915 |
August 09, 2009, 04:07:58 AM
|
Group: Guest
|
David...I agree...but McAdams is trying to have a William F.Buckley chuckle with you....I still go with the first hand accounts who were there.
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
August 09, 2009, 04:34:28 AM
|
Super Member
Posts: 1290
|
McAdams wasn't talking to me above, of course. That's obvious from the words he was speaking. John was talking to a CTer named Robert Harris. Harris, btw, is one of the conspiracy kooks here on Planet Earth who refuses to accept the evidence that's right before his two orbs. Instead, he has decided he'll make up a gunshot at Zapruder Frame #285 (a shot that Harris says missed everything in Dealey Plaza). I sometimes call him Robert "Z285" Harris. For more of Bob's nonsense, you can go here: As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
-------------------------
|
|
|
« Last Edit: August 09, 2009, 04:35:29 AM by David Von Pein »
|
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
Jsnow915 |
August 09, 2009, 04:42:05 AM
|
Group: Guest
|
I've seen Bob Harris's videos and I don't agree with everything he's presented...but your arrogance of calling anyone a kook who doesn't agree with you is disturbing...when are you planning to invade Poland?
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
August 09, 2009, 05:42:51 AM
|
Super Member
Posts: 1290
|
Your arrogance of calling anyone a kook who doesn't agree with you is disturbing. There's another thing you're wrong about, Mr. Snow. I try to reserve the K word for the outer-fringe type of conspiracy theorists -- like the people who think Oswald didn't fire a single shot at ANYBODY on 11/22/63. Those people deserve the "kook" label. Simple as that. Yes, I might also refer to some other CTers as the K word too (i.e., CTers who actually have the sense to know that LHO shot some people in Dallas on Nov. 22). But if I do that, there's a very good reason for it. I can guarantee you that. A good example being -- a ridiculous kook named Thomas H. Purvis. (And Purvis thinks Oswald was the lone gunman.) When are you planning to invade Poland? Does that country need invading? That's news to me.
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
August 09, 2009, 08:36:21 AM
|
Super Member
Posts: 2660
|
It's a bit out of context but it's about McAdams. As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginJohn Simkin made never that statement and McAdams childish apologized: A poster has pointed out to me that perhaps Simkin didn't write that,
but rather the owner of that crazy website did.
If so, I owe Simkin an apology.
Except, he did call me a "disinformation agent," which is a pretty
fascist thing to do. shock2 As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginBe careful folks, call anyone a disinformant agent makes you a fascist. shock2 How should i believe a single word from a man like this?????¿¿¿ Martin
-------------------------
-------------------------
Firework As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginGod bless Emmett Till: As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginInsipired by the Movie "Invictus" and Nelson Mandela. What a poem! As a guest, you are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
August 09, 2009, 08:48:18 AM
|
Super Member
Posts: 2203
|
I've seen Bob Harris's videos and I don't agree with everything he's presented...but your arrogance of calling anyone a kook who doesn't agree with you is disturbing...when are you planning to invade Poland? clapxx It must be hard for conspiracy theorists these days. Especially for you chiefcook and lone nut in one person. David "von Error" Pain. (Sorry, but that's what you did with Bob Harris). I try to reserve the K word for the outer-fringe type of conspiracy theorists -- like the people who think Oswald didn't fire a single shot at ANYBODY on 11/22/63. Those people deserve the "kook" label. Simple as that. Why? Oswald wasn't identified by anybody shooting and the ballistics show that far more than 3 bullets came from elsewhere but the 6th floor east window and witness reports on the Tippit scene saw a lot of things but Oswald. So it's clear it's your private, lone thing to prejudice-label like that. I assume you do all that, cause you think speaking out more truth about the JFK assassination would weaken the American secret-service's self-esteem which would be unfavourable cause America is surrounded by only enemies. Best wishes and kind greetings Chris "fashist" Messner
-------------------------
-------------------------
chase the truth and the devil will overtake you
politics is a conspiracy by nature
listen to jazz
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
August 09, 2009, 11:33:19 AM
|
Super Member
Posts: 1290
|
Oswald wasn't identified by anybody shooting and the ballistics show that far more than 3 bullets came from elsewhere but the 6th floor east window and witness reports on the Tippit scene saw a lot of things but Oswald. The above supremely-ignorant comments made by a member of the Anybody-But-Oswald clique provide further support for the following fact: The silly conspiracy theorists who populate the Internet are positively the VERY LAST PEOPLE on the face of this planet who should be looking into the facts surrounding the assassination of President Kennedy.
-------------------------
|
|
|
« Last Edit: August 09, 2009, 11:36:15 AM by David Von Pein »
|
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
August 09, 2009, 12:05:44 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 2203
|
The silly conspiracy theorists who populate the Internet are positively the VERY LAST PEOPLE on the face of this planet who should be looking into the facts surrounding the assassination of President Kennedy.
And you are arrogant, David.
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
August 09, 2009, 12:11:02 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 3408
|
Oswald wasn't identified by anybody shooting and the ballistics show that far more than 3 bullets came from elsewhere but the 6th floor east window and witness reports on the Tippit scene saw a lot of things but Oswald. The above supremely-ignorant comments made by a member of the Anybody-But-Oswald clique provide further support for the following fact: The silly conspiracy theorists who populate the Internet are positively the VERY LAST PEOPLE on the face of this planet who should be looking into the facts surrounding the assassination of President Kennedy. Christoph? When you make absurd comments as above, it demonstrates you have no clue about the events of 11/22. You deserve to be called silly.
-------------------------
-------------------------
"Life is not a problem to be solved. It is a mystery to be lived".
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 09, 2009, 12:28:49 PM
|
Super Member
Posts: 2203
|
Paul,
thanks for your applause!
David,
maybe I want it, too, maybe, but it looks to me, that because you ignore that the ballistics don't point back to Oswald and nobody really identified Oswald at the Tippit scene, you rather want Oswald to be the LN, whereas I just follow the fact and logic, that when there are more bullet imprints on ground than 3 bullets can produce and especially there is an exit wound in the rear of JFK's head then it can't be possible that there was only a lone assassin and even it would be Oswald who was in the 2nd floor 90 seconds later without being out of breath.
So are you concluding from yourself onto others?
Chris
-------------------------
|
|
|
Reply |
|
|
| 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
|
